Skip to main content

A juvenile bird with possible crown-group affinities from a dinosaur-rich Cretaceous ecosystem in North America



Living birds comprise the most speciose and anatomically diverse clade of flying vertebrates, but their poor early fossil record and the lack of resolution around the relationships of the major clades have greatly obscured extant avian origins.


Here, I describe a Late Cretaceous bird from North America based on a fragmentary skeleton that includes cranial material and portions of the forelimb, hindlimb, and foot and is identified as a juvenile based on bone surface texture. Several features unite this specimen with crown Aves, but its juvenile status precludes the recognition of a distinct taxon. The North American provenance of the specimen supports a cosmopolitan distribution of early crown birds, clashes with the hypothesized southern hemisphere origins of living birds, and demonstrates that crown birds and their closest relatives coexisted with non-avian dinosaurs that independently converged on avian skeletal anatomy, such as the alvarezsaurids and dromaeosaurids.


By revealing the ecological and biogeographic context of Cretaceous birds within or near the crown clade, the Lance Formation specimen provides new insights into the contingent nature of crown avian survival through the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction and the subsequent origins of living bird diversity.

Peer Review reports


Birds form the largest radiation of flying vertebrates and include over ten thousand living species that display exceptional anatomical, behavioral, and ecological diversity. Although their dinosaur origins are now firmly established, the early evolution of the avian crown remains poorly known. This gap in the evolutionary history of living birds is nearly unparalleled among other major vertebrate crown clades [1,2,3,4,5] and is largely attributable to two factors. First, living birds have an exceptionally poor early fossil record. Few unambiguous crown birds are known from the Mesozoic [2, 6,7,8,9], and the fossil records of most major living avian lineages are limited to a handful of fossils or wholly nonexistent [10]. Second, analyses of both massive morphological [11] and genomic datasets have failed to produce a consilient picture of the interrelationships of major living bird clades, presenting one of the greatest challenges in phylogenetics [12,13,14,15,16,17,18].

Here, I use computed tomography to describe a probable Mesozoic crown bird based on an associated skeleton of a juvenile individual from the latest Cretaceous Lance Formation of Wyoming. The provenance of this specimen provides new evidence against the classically hypothesized southern hemisphere origins of living birds. The prehistoric ecosystem inhabited by the crown bird included numerous representatives of extinct stem-birds and bird-like dinosaurs ( [19]; this paper), providing evidence for the direct coexistence of non-avian theropods and the earliest representatives of the extant avian radiation.


Systematic paleontology

Avialae Gauthier 1986.

Neornithes Gadow 1892.

?Neognathae Pycraft 1900.

?Galloanserae Sclater 1880.

?Galloanserae indet.


Yale Peabody Museum Vertebrate Paleontology Collections (YPM VP) 59473, a partial skeleton consisting of the complete left quadrate, portions of the skull roof a partially articulated, though very poorly preserved, cervical series, a fragment of the synsacrum, the left humerus, the articulated left radius and ulna, partial left tibiotarsus, and partial pes. The specimen (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) is preserved in course-grained sediment that also included a small non-avian theropod tooth (identifiable based on the presence of serrations, and plausibly assignable to Tyrannosauroidea or Dromaeosauridae; Supplementary Text III). The bones are all closely associated or articulated (radius and ulna) in three small (< 5 cm) long blocks of conglomerate. Because no bones overlap and all show the same ontogenetic indicators (striated bone texture), they most likely come from a single individual. All bones except for the humerus, tibiotarsus, and a large partial pedal phalanx are embedded in matrix. Matrix portions also still cling to spots on these prepped-out bones. The quadrate was embedded in what appears to be an iron or bone-flake rich region of sediment in the block, and so its external surfaces appear less well preserved on the CT scan render than other bones.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Preservation of YPM VP 59473. The blocks containing all bones of the holotype (except for the humerus, tibiotarsus, synsacrum fragment, and large distal pedal phalanx) are shown under light microscopy (a, e, h) and with multiple x-ray views of the largest (b, c, d), second largest (f, g), and smallest (i) blocks as rendered in VGStudio, showing the relative placement of bones in the matrix blocks

Fig. 2
figure 2

Quadrate of YPM VP 59473 and of †Asteriornis maastrichtensis. Quadrate of YPM VP 59473 in (a) lateral, (b) medial, (c) anterior, (d) dorsal, and (e) ventral views, compared to the quadrate of †Asteriornis maastrichtensis in (f) lateral, (g) medial, (h) anterior, (i) dorsal, and (j) ventral views

Fig. 3
figure 3

Forelimb of YPM VP 59473. Humerus in (a) posterior, (b) anterior, (c) lateral, and (d) medial views. In (a) and (b), both CT scans and color images are shown. Radius in (e) anterior, (f) posterior, (g) lateral, (h) medial, and (i) distal views. Ulna in (j) posterior, (k) anterior, (l) lateral, and (m) medial views

Fig. 4
figure 4

Hindlimb of YPM VP 59473. Tibiotarsus (a) and tarsometatarsus shaft (b) in multiple views

Fig. 5
figure 5

Ontogenetic status of YPM VP 59473. Light microscopy of freed and in situ bones shows clear striated patterning across unfinished bone surfaces identical to bones of ontogenetically immature birds from the Recent

Locality and horizon

Niobrara County, Wyoming, United States, North America. The fossil was collected from the Lance Formation by the J.B. Hatcher expedition, 1890–1904. The Lance Formation is a Maastrichtian-age unit that crops out across the basin and range region of the western U.S. Previously described avian fossils from the YPM collections recovered from the Hatcher expedition to Niobrara County are assumed to come from the upper portion of the Lance Formation, making them up to 0.65 million years older than the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary ( [19]). Consequently, the age of YPM VP 59473 can be constrained to between 66.02 and 67.0 million years ago.


Crown avian and galloanserine affinities for YPM VP 59473 are supported by: clear separation of the otic and squamosal capitula on the quadrate (Fig. 2d); presence of a subcapitular tuberculum below the squamosal capitulum on the quadrate (Fig. 2a); expansion of the ventral condyles and pterygoid condyle on the quadrate (Fig. 2a-c, e); humeral head dorsally offset from the rest of the proximal margin of the humerus (Fig. 3a, b); tricipital fossa is deeply excavated (Fig. 3a, b); dorsal tubercle of the humerus is large and offset from the rest of the proximal margin (Fig. 3a, b).

Ontogenetic assessment

Following the comprehensive review of osteological indicators of ontogenetic status presented in [20], I conducted a survey of YPM VP 59473 which revealed its juvenile status (Fig. 5). Features unambiguously indicating ontogenetic immaturity in birds present in this specimen include the presence of unfinished, heavily striated bone surfaces [20,21,22]. Histological sections were not made due to the fragmentary nature of the specimen. Among the characters used to assign YPM VP 59473 to crown Aves and to Galloanserae, several deserve comment because they appear to change during ontogeny in stem and crown birds: the shape of the humeral head, development of the dorsal tubercle, and the depth of the tricipital fossa. In both juvenile and adult stem birds (for example, †Archaeorhynchus and †Ichthyornis), these features are weakly developed [23,24,25]. In crown birds, the dorsal tubercle and the humeral head become progressively more prominent with ontogeny (for example, Phalacrocorax capillatus; Fig. 3A in [22]. Thus, even accounting for the juvenile status of the specimen, the morphology of YPM VP 59643 is inconsistent with the hypothesis that it is a juvenile stem bird.


Primary firsthand comparative material

Yale Peabody Museum Vertebrate Paleontology Collections.—YPM VP 1450, 1724, 1732, 1733, 1741, 1755, 1775, †Ichthyornis dispar, YPM VP 1734, †Iaceornis marshi, YPM VP 1200, 1472, 1476, 1477, †Hesperornis regalis, YPM VPPU 17324, †Avisaurus archibaldi, YPM VP 830, 835, †Paleotringa spp., YPM VP 850, 855, †Graculavis spp., YPM 147, †Gastornis gigantea, YPM VP 845, †Telmatornis affinis, YPM VP 948, †Anatalavis rex, YPM 102518, Crypturellus noctivagus, YPM 102520, Casuarius casuarius, YPM 15906, Branta canadensis, YPM 84420, Anas platyrhynchos, YPM 137647, Leipoa ocellata, YPM 102549, Grus grus, YPM 102272, Musophaga rossae, YPM 149811, Opisthocomus hoazin, YPM 84809, Cariama cristata, YPM 110763, YPM 110766, YPM 102334, Nestor notabilis, YPM 102276 Sagittarius sagittarius, YPM 104786, Corvus novaezealandiae, YPM 110024, Phaethon rubricauda, YPM 102125, Fulmarus glacialis.

French National Museum of Natural History.—MNHN AC 7994, †Ludiortyx hoffmani.

Mongolian Geological Institute—IGM 100/1017, †Apsaravis ukhaana.


YPM VP 59473 is from a small crown bird; size estimation using the regression equation for humerus length in [26] and an estimated length of 70.0 mm for the nearly complete humerus of YPM VP 59473 gives a value of 413.4 g, which is close to the mass of the †Asteriornis maastrichtensis holotype individual estimated using the same dataset [2].


The left quadrate (Fig. 2a-e) is completely preserved, though slightly abraded along the lateral surface of its main body. The quadrate is similar to those of the early galloanserines †Asteriornis maastrichtensis (Fig. 2f-j) [2], †Presbyornis pervetus [27, 28], and †Gallinuloides wyomingensis [29], but differs considerably from the quadrates of early anseriforms like †Conflicto antarcticus [2, 30] or crown anseriforms and galliforms [2, 28] such as Branta canadensis, Anas platyrhynchos, and Leipoa ocellata. A key apomorphy of Neognathae, the distinct separation of the otic and squamosal capitula at the dorsal end of the quadrate [2], is present in the quadrate of YPM VP 59473 (Fig. 2d). In stem-group ornithurans like †Ichthyornis dispar and †Apsaravis ukhaana, the capitula are not delimited by a deep intercapitular sulcus ([83]; [31]), and in Paleognathae, these form a single proximal process rather than two distinct apices ( [32]). This lack of separation is present in specimens of †Ichthyornis dispar that are of different sizes [31]. Unlike the Lance Formation bird quadrate UCMP 53969 ( [28]), which possess an otic capitulum that is larger and more circular than the squamosal capitulum, the otic and squamosal capitula in the quadrate of YPM VP 59473 are of approximately equal size and shape (Fig. 2c, d). Similarly shaped capitula of equal size are also found in †A. maastrichtensis (Fig. 2h, i).

The main body of the quadrate in YPM VP 59473 is dorsoventrally straight and pillar-like, with slightly concave anterior and posterior margins. Unlike †Asteriornis maastrichtensis (Fig. 2g, h), †Presbyornis pervetus [28], †Conflicto antarcticus [2, 30], the Lance ‘galloanserine’ quadrate described by [9], gastornithiforms [31,32,33], and crown galliforms [2, 27, 28], but similar to most crown anseriforms [2, 28], the quadrate of YPM VP 59473 lacks any identifiable large foramina on the surface of its main body surrounding the orbital process (Fig. 2b, c). A single foramen, the basiorbital foramen, is present in ornithurans close to the crown [34], suggesting that the absence of these in YPM VP 59473 is an autapomorphy. However, the phylogenetic polarity of quadrate main body foramina is unclear. Further, the juvenile status of YPM VP 59473 may imply that main body foramina were present but very small due to ontogeny, as may be the case for one of the foramina in †Asteriornis maastrichtensis [2]. Further, damage to the surface of the quadrate in YPM VP 59473 might obscure the presence of foramina. The orbital process is developed into a triangular flange that expands from slightly over half of the dorsoventral axis of the quadrate main body in YPM VP 59473 (Fig. 2a-e), as in Ornithurae [2, 28, 34, 35]. Based on the preserved bone surface, the orbital process is slightly shorter than in †Ichthyornis dispar [34] and †Conflicto antarcticus, but similar to the process in †Asteriornis maastrichtensis (Fig. 2f, g), Galliformes, and Anseranas semipalmata [2]. However, the apex of the orbital process tends to be broken off in fossil quadrates, so the extent of this feature in YPM VP 59473 should be treated as uncertain.

The ventral end of the quadrate is developed into three major features: the lateral and medial condyles and what appear to be the base of the pterygoid condyle. The quadratojugal cotyla is positioned just dorsal to the lateral condyle, and consists of a deep, circular socket with a complete rim (Fig. 2a). The rim of the quadratojugal cotyla is socketed in crown galliforms and some crown anseriforms, but invariably lacks a notch in pan-anseriforms like †Presbyornis pervetus [2, 27, 28] and †Conflicto antarcticus [2, 30], as well as the pan-galloanserine †Asteriornis maastrichtensis [2] and the Lance ‘galloanserine’ quadrate UCMP 53969 [9].


The humerus (Fig. 3a-d) of YPM VP 59473 is much better preserved than the humeri of the galloanserine †Asteriornis maastrichtensis [2] and allows for comparison with the complete humeri of the putative Mesozoic stem and crown neornithines †Vegavis iaii [6,7,8, 36],Antarcticavis capelambensis [37], †Maaqwi cascadensis [38], †Telmatornis affinis, and †Tingmiatornis arctica [39]. The proximal end of the humerus YPM VP 59473 is marked by its large, prominent, and strongly convex globose humeral head and less developed dorsal and ventral tubercles (Fig. 3a, b), which compares favorably with crown neornithines, †Vegavis iaii [6,7,8, 36], and †Antarcticavis capelambensis [37], but differs from the condition in ichthyornithines [23, 24, 40], †Tingmiatornis arctica [39], and stemward birds, in which humeral head is variously globose but is not strongly offset from the rest of the proximal margin of the humerus.

The dorsal tubercle of the humerus in YPM VP 59473 is strongly developed and offset from the humeral head. The dorsal tubercle is approximately as mediolaterally wide as anteroposteriorly long (Fig. 3a, b). These neornithine synapomorphies distinguish YPM VP 59473,  †Vegavis iaii [6,7,8, 36], and †Antarcticavis capelambensis [37] from non-neornithine ornithurans, such as ichthyornithines [23, 24, 40] and †Apsaravis ukhaana [35]. The ventral tubercle is present and prominent, but markedly smaller than in †Ichthyornis dispar [23, 24] or †Janavis finalidens [40]. The development of the ventral tubercle appears to vary both intraspecifically and ontogenetically in ichthyornithines [23, 24, 40]. The tricipital fossa is deeply concave and extensive, spanning the medial surface of the proximal humerus between the margin of the bicipital crest and the caudal margin (Fig. 3a, b) as in living neornithines, †Vegavis iaii [6,7,8] and †Antarcticavis capelambensis [37], but unlike †Ichthyornis dispar [23, 24], †Janavis finalidens [40], †Apsaravis ukhaana [35], or †Tingmiatornis arctica [39].

The bicipital crest of the humerus of †Borealornis antecatastrophis is large (Fig. 3a-d). This crest is marked on its dorsal surface by the transverse ligament sulcus, which is deep, clearly marked, and linear as in neornithines but unlike the condition in †Ichthyornis dispar [23, 24], †Janavis finalidens [40], or †Apsaravis ukhaana [35], where the sulcus is shallow and rounded. The bicipital crest sits opposite to the deltopectoral crest, which is incompletely preserved. The deltopectoral crest is less distally extensive (measures less than 25% of the long axis of the humerus) than those of †I. dispar [23, 24], †J. finalidens [40], †A. ukhaana [35], or †Tingmiatornis arctica [39], but compares favorably with †Vegavis iaii [6,7,8],Antarcticavis capelambensis [37], and early-diverging crown neornithines [10, 36, 41]. The caudal margin is also well developed in YPM VP 59473 relative to ichthyornithines and other stem birds close to the crown. †T. arcticus also possesses a strongly developed caudal margin of the humerus, despite sharing numerous features with ichthyornithines and not neornithines. The polarity of this character state remains unresolved even though neornithines appear to invariably show prominent caudal humerus margins. The distal end of the humerus of YPM VP 59473 is poorly preserved but does appear to show equally developed dorsal and ventral distal humeral condyles based on the shape and size of their medial portions (Fig. 3a-d).


The radius (Fig. 3e-h) was preserved in articulation with the ulna on the surface of the larger of the two blocks included in the holotype of YPM VP 59473 (Fig. 1). The radius is very long and slender, with a straightened shaft (Fig. 3e-h). The surface of the radial shaft is heavily striated and lacks a finished surface, a feature indicative of the juvenile ontogenetic status of the holotype specimen of YPM VP 59473; this feature is also clearly present on the humerus, ulna, and distal tibiotarsus, although the radius is the best example of this texture on a bone still laying in situ. However, the medial surface of the radius, which is still encased in matrix, shows a conspicuous intermuscular line running down the shaft surface. This intermuscular line is found in living Aves and †Ichthyornis dispar [23, 24].

The anterior surface of the distal end of the radius is marked by a large, round, and shallow sulcus identified as the tendinal groove. This feature lacks the prominent associated ridge found in extinct ornithurans like †Ichthyornis dispar [23] and is generally comparable to the weak tendinal groove found in neornithines (e.g., †Conflicto antarcticus, [30]). Posteriorly, there is a shallow ligamental depression and a weakly developed carpal facet. As in Anseranas semipalmata [41], but unlike stem [29, 42] and crown galliforms (pers. obs.), some anatids [41] (pers. obs. of Branta canadensis), †Ichthyornis dispar [23], or †Apsaravis ukhaana [35], the distal end of the radius is heavily expanded dorsoventrally. The ligamental process is short.


The ulna (Fig. 3j-n) was preserved in articulation with the mostly complete radius on the surface of the larger of the two blocks included in the holotype of YPM VP 59473 (Fig. 1). The partial ulna, which includes at least one third of the shaft and the complete distal end, is uncrushed. The shaft is straight along the long axis of the ulna, curving only at its distal end to meet the radius at the wrist. The distal end of the ulna is approximately twice as wide mediolaterally as anteroposteriorly and has three major processes: the dorsal and ventral distal ulnar condyles and the carpal tubercle. Unlike †Ichthyornis dispar and stem birds within or close to Ornithurae [23, 24, 35], but similar to many neornithines (pers. obs., see specimens noted above), the carpal tubercle of the ulna is poorly developed and only differentiated from the rest of the bone by a shallow groove. The ovoid dorsal and ventral condyles are poorly developed and separated by a shallow intercondylar groove. Laterally, the surface of the dorsal condyle is marked by a shallow tendinal groove that runs proximodistally along the surface of the distal ulna.


Some of the shaft and the eroded distal end of the left tibiotarsus were preserved (Fig. 4a). This bone is elongated and more gracile than the tibiotarsi of †Ichthyornis dispar [23, 24] or †Apsaravis ukhaana [35], but similar to †Vegavis iaii [7], †Polarornis gregorii [8], and early neognaths [2, 10, 29, 41, 42]. A shallow extensor groove runs across the anterior surface of the bone. Generally, the morphology of the tibiotarsus and tarsometatarsus (see below) indicates that the hindlimb of YPM VP 59473 was gracile and long.


The shaft of the tarsometatarsus is preserved on the surface of the smaller block included in the holotype of YPM VP 59473 (Figs. 1, 4 and 5) and is identifiable as such based on its flattened, elliptical shaft, shallow extensor groove, and discrete lateral and medial margins (Fig. 4b). Little can be said about the morphology of this bone except that the distal end of the metatarsus appears to be more elongated than in †Ichthyornis dispar [23, 24], hesperornithines (e.g., [43]), or †Apsaravis ukhaana [35], but similar to the Maastrichtian galloanserine †Asteriornis maastrichtensis [2], and the possibly anseriform presbyornithids [41, 44, 45]. The possible Maastrichtian Antarctic neornithines †Vegavis iaii and †Antarcticavis capelambensis also all possess similarly elongated, fused tarsometatarsi such that the shaft of the bone shows little indication of each of the co-ossified bones [6,7,8, 37].


Six pedal phalanges and three possible pedal elements are preserved in the holotype of YPM VP 59473 (Fig. 1) with varying degrees of completeness (Fig. 6). Based on the morphology of the preserved phalanges, I reconstruct the pes of YPM VP 59473 as elongated, with pedal phalanges that decrease in length towards the distal ends of each digit (this is the condition in most other birds, with larger phalanges proximally). In this way, the pes of YPM VP 59473 compares well with †Ichthyornis dispar [23, 24], †Janavis finalidens [40], †Vegavis iaii [6,7,8], modern anseriforms like Anas and Branta (pers. obs.), and wading birds in the clade Neoaves (i.e., Gruiformes, Pelicaniformes; Charadriiformes; Mirandornithes), but contrasts markedly with the pes of stem and crown group galliforms [29, 42, 46], the ornithuran †Apsaravis ukhaana [35], and many other predominately terrestrial birds. The pes of YPM VP 59473 also differs from the specialized pes of penguins (Sphenisciformes; pers. obs.) and members of the clade †Hesperornithes, which are robust and asymmetrical [43]. Here, I focus on describing the six definite phalanges.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Pedal elements of YPM VP 59473. Pedal phalanges I-1? (a), I-1?(b), II-1? (c), III-1? (d), II-3? (e), and IV-5? (f) in multiple views. In (d), phalanx is shown in both color illustrations and CT scans

Two small, poorly preserved phalanges (Fig. 6a, b) are columnar and hollow internally, with slightly asymmetrical distal condyles separated by a deep intercondylar sulcus (Fig. 6a, b). However, the identification of these bones as phalanges is tentative, and they may be warped, fragmented portions of other long bones. One very elongated, slightly mediolaterally asymmetrical proximal phalanx (Fig. 6c) and the complete distal ungual (Fig. 6e) appear to represent either digits II or IV given their asymmetry. The ungual possesses a concave, elliptical proximal articular surface and a large, proximally positioned flexor tubercle on its ventral surface. The ungual body is weakly recurved. On the lateral and medial surfaces of the main body of the ungual, deep neurovascular grooves curve along the main axis.

Pedal digit III as reconstructed is represented by the distal third of the first phalanx, the proximal two-thirds of the second phalanx, and the complete third phalanx. These phalanges are bilaterally symmetrical and mediolaterally widened relative to the other bones of the pes. An asymmetrical distal end of the proximal phalanx (Fig. 6d) and a complete, poorly recurved, and slightly mediolaterally asymmetrical pedal ungual (Fig. 6f) are also likely from digits II or IV.


YPM VP 59473 sheds light on the biogeography of early crown birds and their closest relatives. Although stem birds are plentiful in the Late Cretaceous of North and South America [4, 5, 43, 47, 48], the record of Mesozoic crown birds from North and South America is restricted to a number of isolated bones of unclear phylogenetic position and provenance [4, 9].

The discovery of YPM VP 59473 provides additional evidence that bird species very near to and within the crown clade acquired a cosmopolitan distribution by the Late Cretaceous, which is logical given the inferred capability for flight in YPM VP 59473 and other derived ornithurans like †Ichthyornis dispar and †Vegavis iaii [3, 6, 7, 23]. On a larger scale, the provenance of YPM VP 59473 underscores the ambiguity surrounding the geographic origins of living bird diversity. The earliest-diverging clades of living birds, such as the paleognaths, megapodes, magpie goose Anseranas, and anhimids, are all found in the southern hemisphere, a pattern that appears to support to an origin for crown birds in the southern continents [49]. However, growing evidence from the fossil record has shown that these now exclusively southern hemisphere bird clades were once also distributed across the northern continents [10, 19, 50,51,52,53]; the current distributions of clades as varied as mousebirds, seriemas, and hoatzins appear to represent contractions of far wider prehistoric ranges [54] The presence of YPM VP 59473 in North America supports a modified view of early crown avian biogeography that featured early cosmopolitanism followed by recent radiations into and throughout the southern hemisphere.

The discovery of YPM VP 59473 also provides new information on the ecological context of early crown bird evolution and survival through the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) mass extinction, which killed all non-avian dinosaurs and all major stem bird clades. The ecologies of living birds and early members of the crown indicate that the K-Pg extinction globally selected against arboreal and large-bodied species [3, 14, 55]. The Lance Formation ecosystem that YPM VP 59473 inhabited included a diverse assemblage of toothed stem-birds from at least four major clades (Fig. 7; [4]). A survey of the Lance Formation theropod fauna in the Yale Peabody Museum collections also shows that this unit has produced material assignable to eudromaeosaurian, alvarezsaurid, troodontid, and potentially ‘four-winged’ microraptorine dinosaurs (Supplementary Information). A serrated tooth resembling those of dromaeosaurids and small tyrannosaurids (e.g., [56, 57]) is included in YPM VP 59473 and apparently came from the same block of conglomerate. Although the formation that produced European crown bird †Asteriornis maastrichtensis has also yielded a handful of non-avian dinosaur fossils, these are isolated and fragmentary ‘bloat and float’ bones that were washed out to sea and scavenged [58], and therefore do not necessarily come from the same ecosystem. The preservation of a well-preserved theropod tooth in the same block as YPM VP 59473, as well as the diversity of small-bodied non-avian theropod material recovered from various horizons in the Lance Formation, provides strong evidence for the coexistence of crown birds and non-avian dinosaurs in the northern hemisphere.

Fig. 7
figure 7

The ecological and temporal origins of living birds. Left side of the diagram shows the temporal and spatial range extensions and records of key small-bodied non-avian theropod clades found in the Lance Formation assemblage, and cladogram at right shows the major clades of stem and crown birds that survive to or past the K-Pg extinction, with ecologically relevant features that have been considered important to differential avian survival through that event noted along branches. All clades shown on tree are unambiguously represented in the Lance Formation assemblage, except Neoaves and Paleognathae. Divergence times for major lineages are primarily based on [2, 13, 14]. Outlines are public domain from or by the author. Bird illustrations are public domain by John Gould

The coexistence of YPM VP 59473 and a diverse fauna of bird-like theropods and stem-birds (Fig. 7) raises the question of what factors might have mediated crown bird survival across the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, particularly as many features thought to have aided the survival of crown birds, such as a littoral ecology [2, 44], arboreality and flight capacity [3, 59,60,61], dietary diversity [62,63,64,65], and terrestriality [3] are now known to have occurred across most of the major stem clades, including enantiornithines and ichthyornithines, that existed up to the time of the extinction. In sum, the anatomical and ecological information provided by YPM VP 59473 suggests that the survival of all three main clades of crown birds across the boundary (Fig. 7) is an excellent example of contingency in evolution. Rather than possessing a unique set of traits that facilitated their survival, crown birds may have been the ‘happy few’ that persisted across the K-Pg boundary as the more speciose and ecologically diverse stem-birds and non-avian dinosaurs went extinct around them.


Microscopy and measurements

Detailed characterization of the anatomy of bones and bone surfaces free of matrix was carried out using a standard light microscope at the Yale Peabody Museum. Ontogenetically informative characteristics were identified following several papers, especially [20,21,22] as well as via comparisons with juvenile bird skeletons at the YPM. Measurements of the specimen were taken using digital calipers and are included in Table S1.

Computed tomography scanning and segmentation

Computed tomography (CT) scanning has facilitated the examination of three-dimensionally preserved Cretaceous avian fossils in exceptional detail without disturbing them from the matrix [2, 34, 40, 55]. The possibility that the conglomerate blocks included in YPM VP 59473 might store extensive avian material was considered following the description of †Asteriornis maastrichtensis and †Janavis finalidens from the late Maastrichtian of Belgium; both of these were recovered from block specimens [2, 40]. High-resolution CT scanning of YPM VP 59473 was conducted by M. Fox at the Yale Peabody Museum CT scanning facility. Scanning parameters are in Table S3. Individual elements were visualized and segmented using the programs 3D Slicer [66] and VGStudio MAX 3.5. Final renders were produced in the program Blender v 3.4.0.

Lance formation faunal survey

The collections of the Yale Peabody Museum contain numerous small vertebrate fossils from the 1903 J.B. Hatcher expedition to Niobrara County, Wyoming, and subsequent collection trips to Lance Formation outcrop. To understand the ecological community of YPM VP 59473, I conducted a survey of all catalogued fossil avian and non-avian theropod material in the Yale Peabody Museum, with Supplemental survey information from previous publications (e.g., [4]). Comparative anatomical work was conducted using anatomical data collected from the Yale Peabody Museum, American Museum of Natural History, Muséum National D'histoire Naturelle, Denver Museum of Nature and Science, and New Jersey State Museum. Pie charts and other visualizations were made using the R 4.0.2 program ggplot2 3.4.2. The Supplementary Text contains additional description and assignment justifications for theropod fossils that are newly described in this contribution, which include the first probable records of microraptorines and alvarezsaurids of the genus †Trierarchuncus prairiensis [67] from the Lance Formation.

Availability of data and materials

All data is available in the main text and supplementary files, and the raw CT data are uploaded to Morphosource at:


  1. Dyke GJ, Van Tuinen M. The evolutionary radiation of modern birds (Neornithes): reconciling molecules, morphology and the fossil record. Zool J Linn Soc. 2004;141:153–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Field DJ, Benito J, Chen A, Jagt JWM, Ksepka DT. Late Cretaceous neornithine from Europe illuminates the origins of crown birds. Nature. 2020;579:397–401.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Field DJ, Bercovici A, Berv JS, Dunn R, Fastovsky DE, Lyson TR, et al. Early evolution of modern birds structured by global forest collapse at the end-cretaceous mass extinction. Curr Biol. 2018;28:1825-1831.e2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Longrich NR, Tokaryk T, Field DJ. Mass extinction of birds at the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K–Pg) boundary. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:15253–7.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Pittman M, Xu X. Pennaraptoran Theropod Dinosaurs Past Progress and New Frontiers. amnb. 2020;440:1–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke JA, Tambussi CP, Noriega JI, Erickson GM, Ketcham RA. Definitive fossil evidence for the extant avian radiation in the Cretaceous. Nature. 2005;433:305–8.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Acosta Hospitaleche C, Worthy TH. New data on the Vegavisiaai holotype from the Maastrichtian of Antarctica. Cretac Res. 2021;124: 104818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clarke JA, Chatterjee S, Li Z, Riede T, Agnolin F, Goller F, et al. Fossil evidence of the avian vocal organ from the Mesozoic. Nature. 2016;538:502–5.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elzanowski A, Stidham TA. A Galloanserine quadrate from the late cretaceous lance formation of Wyoming. Auk. 2011;128:138–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Field DJ, Hsiang AY. A North American stem turaco, and the complex biogeographic history of modern birds. BMC Evol Biol. 2018;18:102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Livezey BC, Zusi RL. Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion. Zool J Linn Soc. 2007;149:1–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hackett SJ, Kimball RT, Reddy S, Bowie RCK, Braun EL, Braun MJ, et al. A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history. Science. 2008;320:1763–8.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Prum RO, Berv JS, Dornburg A, Field DJ, Townsend JP, Lemmon EM, et al. A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature. 2015;526:569–73.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Berv JS, Singhal S, Field DJ, Walker-Hale N, McHugh SW, Shipley JR, et al. Molecular early burst associated with the diversification of birds at the K–Pg boundary. 2022;:2022.10.21.513146.

  15. Jarvis ED, Mirarab S, Aberer AJ, Li B, Houde P, Li C, et al. Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds. Science. 2014;346:1320–31.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Reddy S, Kimball RT, Pandey A, Hosner PA, Braun MJ, Hackett SJ, et al. Why Do Phylogenomic Data Sets Yield Conflicting Trees? Data Type Influences the Avian Tree of Life more than Taxon Sampling. Syst Biol. 2017;66:857–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuhl H, Frankl-Vilches C, Bakker A, Mayr G, Nikolaus G, Boerno ST, et al. An Unbiased Molecular Approach Using 3′-UTRs Resolves the Avian Family-Level Tree of Life. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38:108–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kimball RT, Oliveros CH, Wang N, White ND, Barker FK, Field DJ, et al. A Phylogenomic Supertree of Birds. Diversity. 2019;11:109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ksepka DT, Clarke JA. New fossil mousebird (Aves: Coliiformes) with feather preservation provides insight into the ecological diversity of an Eocene North American avifauna. Zool J Linn Soc. 2010;160:685–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Griffin CT, Stocker MR, Colleary C, Stefanic CM, Lessner EJ, Riegler M, et al. Assessing ontogenetic maturity in extinct saurian reptiles. Biol Rev. 2021;96:470–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Watanabe J, Matsuoka H. Ontogenetic change of morphology and surface texture of long bones in the Gray Heron (Ardea cinerea, Ardeidae). 2013. p. 279–306.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Watanabe J. Ontogeny of Surface Texture of Limb Bones in Modern Aquatic Birds and Applicability of Textural Ageing. Anat Rec. 2018;301:1026–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Benito J, Chen A, Wilson LE, Bhullar BAS, Burnham D, Field DJ. Forty new specimens of Ichthyornis provide unprecedented insight into the postcranial morphology of crownward stem group birds. PeerJ. 2022;10:e13919.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Clarke JA, History PM of N. Morphology, phylogenetic taxonomy, and systematics of Ichthyornis and Apatornis (Avialae, Ornithurae). Bull AMNH. 2004;286:1–286.

  25. Foth C, Wang S, Spindler F, Lin Y, Yang R. A Juvenile Specimen of Archaeorhynchus Sheds New Light on the Ontogeny of Basal Euornithines. Front Earth Sci. 2021;9:604520.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Field DJ, Lynner C, Brown C, Darroch SAF. Skeletal Correlates for Body Mass Estimation in Modern and Fossil Flying Birds. PLoS One. 2013;8:e82000.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Elzanowski A. More evidence for Plesiomorphy of the quadrate in the Eocene Anseriform Avian Genus Presbyornis. Acta Palaeontol Pol. 2013;59:821–5.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Elzanowski A, Stidham TA. Morphology of the quadrate in the Eocene anseriform Presbyornis and extant galloanserine birds. J Morphol. 2010;271:305–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mayr G, Weidig I. The Early Eocene bird Gallinuloides wyomingensis - a stem group representative of Galliformes. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 2004;49(2):211–7.

  30. Tambussi CP, Degrange FJ, De Mendoza RS, Sferco E, Santillana S. A stem anseriform from the early Palaeocene of Antarctica provides new key evidence in the early evolution of waterfowl. Zool J Linn Soc. 2019;186:673–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Worthy TH, Handley WD, Archer M, Hand SJ. The extinct flightless mihirungs (Aves, Dromornithidae): cranial anatomy, a new species, and assessment of Oligo-Miocene lineage diversity. J Vertebr Paleontol. 2016;36:e1031345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Matthew WD, Granger W, Stein W. The skeleton of Diatryma, a gigantic bird from the Lower Eocene of Wyoming. Bulletin of the AMNH ; v. 37, article 11. 1917.

  33. Handley WD, Worthy TH. Endocranial Anatomy of the Giant Extinct Australian Mihirung Birds (Aves, Dromornithidae). Diversity. 2021;13:124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Torres CR, Norell MA, Clarke JA. Bird neurocranial and body mass evolution across the end-Cretaceous mass extinction: The avian brain shape left other dinosaurs behind. Sci Adv. 2021;7:eabg7099.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Clarke JA, Norell MA. The Morphology and Phylogenetic Position of Apsaravis ukhaana from the Late Cretaceous of Mongolia. novi. 2002;2002:1–46.

  36. Mayr G, De Pietri VL, Scofield RP, Worthy TH. On the taxonomic composition and phylogenetic affinities of the recently proposed clade Vegaviidae Agnolín et al., 2017 - neornithine birds from the Upper Cretaceous of the Southern Hemisphere. Cretac Res. 2018;86:178–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cordes-Person A, Acosta Hospitaleche C, Case J, Martin J. An enigmatic bird from the lower Maastrichtian of Vega Island, Antarctica. Cretac Res. 2020;108:104314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. McLachlan SMS, Kaiser GW, Longrich NR. Maaqwi cascadensis: A large, marine diving bird (Avialae: Ornithurae) from the Upper Cretaceous of British Columbia, Canada. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0189473.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Bono RK, Clarke J, Tarduno JA, Brinkman D. A Large Ornithurine Bird (Tingmiatornis arctica) from the Turonian High Arctic: Climatic and Evolutionary Implications. Sci Rep. 2016;6:38876.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Benito J, Kuo P-C, Widrig KE, Jagt JWM, Field DJ. Cretaceous ornithurine supports a neognathous crown bird ancestor. Nature. 2022;612:100–5.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. De Pietri VL, Scofield RP, Zelenkov N, Boles WE, Worthy TH. The unexpected survival of an ancient lineage of anseriform birds into the Neogene of Australia: the youngest record of Presbyornithidae. Royal Soc Open Sci. 2016;3:150635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mayr G. New specimens of the early Eocene stem group galliform Paraortygoides (Gallinuloididae), with comments on the evolution of a crop in the stem lineage of Galliformes. J Ornithol. 2006;1:31–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bell A, Chiappe LM. Anatomy of Parahesperornis: Evolutionary Mosaicism in the Cretaceous Hesperornithiformes (Aves). Life. 2020;10:62.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Olson SL, Feduccia A. Presbyornis and the Origin of the Anseriformes (Aves: Charadriomorphae). 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zelenkov NV. A Revision of the Palaeocene-Eocene Mongolian Presbyornithidae (Aves: Anseriformes). Paleontol J. 2021;55:323–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Worthy TH, Mitri M, Handley WD, Lee MSY, Anderson A, Sand C. Osteology Supports a Stem-Galliform Affinity for the Giant Extinct Flightless Bird Sylviornisneocaledoniae (Sylviornithidae, Galloanseres). PLoS One. 2016;11:e0150871.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Longrich N. An ornithurine-dominated avifauna from the Belly River Group (Campanian, Upper Cretaceous) of Alberta, Canada. Cretac Res. 2009;30:161–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Chiappe LM, Calvo JO. Neuquenornisvolans, a new Late Cretaceous bird (Enantiornithes: Avisauridae) from Patagonia, Argentina. J Vertebr Paleontol. 1994;14:230–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Claramunt S, Cracraft J. A new time tree reveals Earth history’s imprint on the evolution of modern birds. Sci Adv. 2015;1:e1501005.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Mayr G. Osteology and phylogenetic affinities of the middle Eocene North American Bathornis grallator—one of the best represented, albeit least known Paleogene cariamiform birds (seriemas and allies). J Paleontol. 2016;90:357–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mayr G, Kitchener AC. New species from the early Eocene London Clay suggest an undetected early Eocene diversity of the Leptosomiformes, an avian clade that includes a living fossil from Madagascar. Palaeobio Palaeoenv. 2022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Mayr G, De Pietri VL. Earliest and first Northern Hemispheric hoatzin fossils substantiate Old World origin of a “Neotropic endemic.” Naturwissenschaften. 2014;101:143–8.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ksepka DT, Stidham TA, Williamson TE. Early Paleocene landbird supports rapid phylogenetic and morphological diversification of crown birds after the K-Pg mass extinction. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114:8047–52.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Saupe EE, Farnsworth A, Lunt DJ, Sagoo N, Pham KV, Field DJ. Climatic shifts drove major contractions in avian latitudinal distributions throughout the Cenozoic. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019;116:12895–900.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Berv JS, Field DJ. Genomic Signature of an Avian Lilliput Effect across the K-Pg Extinction. Syst Biol. 2018;67:1–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Williamson TE, Brusatte SL. Small Theropod Teeth from the Late Cretaceous of the San Juan Basin, Northwestern New Mexico and Their Implications for Understanding Latest Cretaceous Dinosaur Evolution. PLoS One. 2014;9:e93190.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Larson DW, Currie PJ. Multivariate analyses of small theropod dinosaur teeth and implications for paleoecological turnover through time. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e54329.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Madzia D, Jagt JWM, Mulder EWA. Osteology, phylogenetic affinities and taxonomic status of the enigmatic late Maastrichtian ornithopod taxon Orthomerus dolloi (Dinosauria, Ornithischia). Cretac Res. 2020;108:104334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Chiappe LM, Di L, Serrano FJ, Yuguang Z, Meng Q. Anatomy and Flight Performance of the Early Enantiornithine Bird Protopteryx fengningensis: Information from New Specimens of the Early Cretaceous Huajiying Formation of China. Anat Rec. 2020;303:716–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Liu D, Chiappe LM, Serrano F, Habib M, Zhang Y, Meng Q. Flight aerodynamics in enantiornithines: Information from a new Chinese Early Cretaceous bird. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0184637.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Wang M, O’Connor JK, Zhao T, Pan Y, Zheng X, Wang X, et al. An Early Cretaceous enantiornithine bird with a pintail. Curr Biol. 2021;31:4845-4852.e2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Clark AD, Hu H, Benson RB, O’Connor JK. Reconstructing the dietary habits and trophic positions of the Longipterygidae (Aves: Enantiornithes) using neontological and comparative morphological methods. PeerJ. 2023;11:e15139.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Miller CV, Pittman M, Wang X, Zheng X, Bright JA. Quantitative investigation of pengornithid enantiornithine diet reveals macrocarnivorous ecology evolved in birds by Early Cretaceous. iScience. 2023;26:106211.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Miller CV, Pittman M, Wang X, Zheng X, Bright JA. Diet of Mesozoic toothed birds (Longipterygidae) inferred from quantitative analysis of extant avian diet proxies. BMC Biol. 2022;20:101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. The diet of early birds based on modern and fossil evidence and a new framework for its reconstruction - Miller - 2021 - Biological Reviews - Wiley Online Library. Accessed 26 Jan 2024.

  66. Kikinis R, Pieper SD, Vosburgh KG. 3D Slicer: A Platform for Subject-Specific Image Analysis, Visualization, and Clinical Support. In: Jolesz FA, editor. Intraoperative Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy. New York, NY: Springer; 2014. p. 277–89.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  67. Fowler DW, Wilson JP, Freedman Fowler EA, Noto CR, Anduza D, Horner JR. Trierarchuncus prairiensis gen. et sp. Nov., the last alvarezsaurid: Hell Creek Formation (uppermost Maastrichtian) Montana. Cretac Res. 2020;116:104560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The author would like to thank M. Fox for scanning YPM VP 59473 and for help with working with scan segments, DJ Field for providing segmentation data for †Asteriornis maastrichtensis, the Yale Vertebrate Paleontology lab for access to the VGStudio software, and Yale University for support of this research via the Mellon and Richter Fellowships. Finally, the author thanks the editor — and reviewers for their comments, which greatly improved this paper.

Code availability

All code is available in the Supplementary Files uploaded to BMC Ecology and Evolution.


The author received no funding for this work. The author is supported by the Yale Richter and Mellon Undergraduate Fellowships.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



C.D.B. conducted all analyses, collected all data, and wrote and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chase Doran Brownstein.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate


Consent for publication


Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brownstein, C.D. A juvenile bird with possible crown-group affinities from a dinosaur-rich Cretaceous ecosystem in North America. BMC Ecol Evo 24, 20 (2024).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: