Skip to main content
Download PDF

Purifying selection leads to low protein diversity of the mitochondrial cyt b gene in avian malaria parasites

BMC Ecology and Evolution volume 23, Article number: 49 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Mitochondrial respiration plays a central role in the survival of many eukaryotes, including apicomplexan parasites. A 479-bp fragment from the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene is widely used as a barcode to identify genetic lineages of avian malaria parasites Plasmodium and related haemosporidians. Here we looked for evidence of selection in the avian Plasmodium cyt b gene, using tests of selection and protein structure modeling. We also tested for the association between cyt b polymorphism and the host specificity of these parasites.

Results

Based on 1,089 lineages retrieved from the Malavi database, we found that the frequency of the most conserved amino acids in most sites was more than 90%, indicating that the protein diversity of the avian Plasmodium cyt b barcode was low. The exceptions were four amino acid sites that were highly polymorphic, though the substitutions had only slight functional impacts on the encoded proteins. The selection analyses revealed that avian Plasmodium cyt b was under strong purifying selection, and no positively selected sites were detected. Besides, lineages with a wide host range tend to share cyt b protein haplotypes.

Conclusions

Our research indicates that purifying selection is the dominant force in the evolution of the avian Plasmodium cyt b lineages and leads to its low diversity at the protein level. Host specificity may also play a role in shaping the low mitochondrial diversity in the evolution of avian malaria parasites. Our results highlight the importance of considering selection pressure on the cyt b barcode region and lay a foundation for further understanding the evolutionary pattern of mitochondrial genes in avian malaria.

Peer Review reports

Background

In most eukaryotes, mitochondria play a central role in cellular metabolism, providing the energy necessary for survival. Among them, apicomplexan parasites, which obtain nutrition through obligate intracellular parasitism, have a highly reduced mitochondrial genome. Their mitochondrial genome is the smallest among all known eukaryotes, composed of three protein-encoding genes: cytochrome b (cyt b), cytochrome oxidase I (cox1), and cytochrome oxidase III (cox3) plus fragmented ribosomal RNAs [1,2,3,4], which signifies the reduced function of the organelle [5, 6].

Cytochrome b is the only mitochondrial gene that seems to be unconditionally necessary for the metabolism and survival of Plasmodium [7]. The coding product Cyt b occurs as part of the cytochrome III assembly in the electron transport chain (ETC). Cyt b contains eight transmembrane domains together with two functional reaction sites: ubiquinol oxidation site (Qo) and ubiquinone reduction site (Qi) [8]. Owing to its central role in cellular energy production, variable selective pressures in different host species may contribute to its evolutionary patterns [9].

In free-living eukaryotes, despite several contrary evidence, cyt b has been largely assumed to be under neutral evolution [10, 11]. However, the selection from diverse hosts implies that such a pattern may not hold for apicomplexan parasites. Given the important functions of cyt b and its current use as a barcode in some apicomplexan parasite taxa, it is necessary to investigate the diversity of cyt b and its possible driving forces. Earlier studies suggested that positive selection acted on cyt b barcode region of Haemosporidian parasites as a result of the switch from avian hosts to mammals [12, 13]. Pacheco et al. [14] proposed that the haemosporidian mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) was under purifying selection and the different strengths of negative selection among parasite clades may be due to the co-evolution with adaptation to vector insects. In Eimeria parasites, positive selection was detected in several codons of mtDNA-encoded proteins against a background of purifying selection. Host species and pathogenicity were considered to be important factors that might shape mitochondrial variation [15].

Avian malaria parasites (genus Plasmodium) are a class of mosquito-transmitted haemosporidian parasites that cause infectious diseases. They are globally distributed [16,17,18], infecting over 2,400 avian species [19], and pose a serious threat to bird health [20]. A 479-bp segment of cyt b sequences has been widely used as a barcode to define unique lineages of avian malaria parasites and related haemosporidians [21, 22], which is included in the MalAvi database (http://mbio-serv2.mbioekol.lu.se/Malavi/index.html) [23]. Avian Plasmodium parasites are the basal clade of malaria parasites and have higher species diversity than other groups of malaria parasites [14], which makes it an ideal system for studying the molecular evolution of pathogens. However, the selection pressure of avian malaria cyt b evolution remains unknown and it is an open question to explore why the identical cyt b barcodes sometimes are shared by different cryptic species [24, 25]. In order to evaluate the availability of the cyt b barcode region, we investigated its selection pressure in avian malaria parasites.

The ability of avian malaria lineages to adapt to different hosts varies widely, reflected by the highly variable host range [18, 26]: More than half of avian malaria parasites appear to infect single host species, whereas other parasites could infect several or even dozens of bird species [27]. For instance, the notorious Plasmodium relictum has infected at least 120 species of birds around the world, leading to the extinction of a variety of Hawaiian land birds [28, 29]. Whether host specificity would act as a selection force on cyt b variation in avian Plasmodium remains to be studied. Previous studies generally focused on nucleotide diversity of cyt b [21, 27], but few on protein diversity, which limits our understanding of the driving forces of the evolution of avian malaria parasites.

In this study, we analyzed a total of 1,089 avian Plasmodium lineages recorded in the MalAvi database using an integrative approach combining tests of selection, amino acid polymorphism analysis, and protein 3D structure modeling. Specifically, we aim to: (i) present the protein haplotype diversity of avian Plasmodium cyt b, (ii) test for selection acted on the cyt b proteins, and (iii) explore the possible impact of host specificity on cyt b protein diversity in avian malaria parasites.

Result

Protein diversity of avian Plasmodium barcodes

A total of 459 protein haplotypes were acquired from 1,089 avian malaria lineages. When looking at each site across the 158 aa fragment separately, the frequency of the most conserved amino acid at 154 sites was above 90%, including seven fixed sites (Fig. 1). The remaining four sites (sites 35, 97,147, and 153) which have no amino acids with frequencies higher than 75%, was defined as highly polymorphic sites (HPSs) (Fig. 1, Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Even if in HPSs, the two most conserved amino acids together account for over 90% of the total samples.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The relative frequencies of amino acids at each amino acid site of 474-bp cyt b. The plot is based on sequences of 1,089 avian malaria lineages. Sites whose most conserved amino acid accounted for no more than 75% are defined as highly polymorphic sites (HPSs) and are highlighted in pink. (The first amino acid was trimmed, see Methods)

Full size image

Protein modeling and mutation effects of highly polymorphic sites

A three-dimensional protein model of full-length cyt b of Plasmodium relictum (Fig. 2) was generated with the confidence of 0.78 (1.0 good, 0.0 bad). HPSs were mapped onto the predicted 3D structure and all of them were located in the transmembrane domain. The PROVEAN analysis suggested that the substitutions occurring in all four HPSs were neutral (Table 1). Three sites (sites 35, 97, and 147) were identified as destabilizing indicating a gain in flexibility while site 153 showed a decrease in molecule flexibility by DYNAMUT (Table 1).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Three-dimensional ribbon model of CytB protein in avian malaria predicted by the three-track neural network. The mitochondrial inner membrane (MIM), as previously suggested [30], is roughly marked with two horizontal lines. The site numbers with arrows correspond to the positions in the barcode region as shown in Fig. 1. (Green: highly polymorphic sites, light blue: Qi residues, orange: Qo residues, red: the catalytic PEWY motif. IMS, inner membrane space; IL, inner leaflet; IMS, inner membrane space; OL, outer leaflet)

Full size image
Table 1 The potential functional effect of main amino acid substitutions at HPSs (x—indicate positive selection by the selection test)
Full size table

Evidence of natural selection

The cyt b barcode region presented a high percentage of codons under purifying selection, according to the SLAC, FUBAR, and FEL methods. The majority of codons were under purifying selection (122,128, and 128 sites, respectively), together with 20 neutral codons. No evidence of positive selection was observed by SLAC, FUBAR, and FEL tests (Table 2). Four codon positions (sites 35, 44,136, and 143) were suggested to be under positive selection by MEME (Table 2). In the site model analyses of CodeML, the null model was rejected in the pairwise comparisons indicating that the ω values were variable across sites and cyt b was not evolving under neutrality (Additional file 1: Table S1). Though positive selection models (M2a / M8) fitted the data better than the nearly neutral models (M1a / M7), no positive selection sites were detected.

Table 2 Results of selection tests according to five different methods
Full size table

The correspondence between DNA sequences and their protein haplotypes

We found that 61 protein haplotypes were shared by 65.3% of the lineages (n = 711) while 378 lineages possessed unique protein haplotypes. Among 980 lineages with bird host information, 651 lineages shared 61 protein haplotypes, and 319 lineages had unique protein haplotypes (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). The point-biserial correlation coefficient was positive (r = 0.173, P < 0.001), suggesting that parasites that can infect more host species tend to share the cyt b protein haplotypes with others.

Discussion

In the current study, we demonstrated that purifying selection is the main evolutionary force leading to low cyt b protein diversity. Additionally, host specificity may be a factor in shaping the mitochondrial diversity in avian malaria parasites. These results enhance our understanding of the molecular evolution of avian malaria cyt b.

Diversity and selection of the cyt b barcode region in avian malaria parasites

The frequency of the most conserved amino acids in almost all sites was more than 95%. Moreover, all four HPSs were located in the transmembrane domain rather than the functional reaction sites Qo or Qi. Such non-synonymous substitutions seemed to have only slight, if any functional effects. These patterns indicate that the protein diversity in cyt b barcode region of avian malaria parasites was low.

According to four different DATAMONKEY selection tests, a high number of purifying selection sites were observed with the exception of a few positively selected sites detected by MEME. In PAML, M2a (selection) / M8 (beta&ω) fitted the data better than M1a (neutral) / M7 (beta), indicating that this gene was not evolving under neutrality. Additionally, no positive selection sites were detected under M2a and M8. Sites that had received consistent support in at least two methods can be considered as positive selection sites (as recommended by [31, 32]). Hence, we hold that avian Plasmodium cyt b was globally evolving under purifying selection and there were no sites under positive selection. Indeed, given the key function in pyrimidine biosynthesis in the asexual stage, and an ATP-generating function in the insect stage [6, 33], it’s not surprising that purifying selection is the predominant force shaping cyt b evolution, which is in agreement with the general trends in mtDNA selection tests [14, 31]. Moreover, computer simulations suggested that the efficiency of purifying selection in Plasmodium was intensified by their complicated life cycle [34], which was consistent with our observations from actual data. Purifying selection constantly sweeps away deleterious mutations that are produced in each generation to ensure functional stability and thus plays a key role in shaping the low protein diversity of avian Plasmodium cyt b.

The possible impact of host specificity on cyt b protein diversity

In the analyses of the correspondence between lineages and their protein, we found that about two-thirds of lineages shared cyt b haplotypes with others, while the rest of the lineages possessed unique protein haplotypes. An important question is whether the lineages sharing protein haplotypes have some phenotypic or life-history characteristics in common. There is limited phenotypic information related to the mtDNA [14]. However, host diversification seems to be one of the important factors that may shape mitochondrial variation in parasites. Haemosporidian cyt b lineages and their avian hosts show evidence of a weak but significant cophylogenetic congruence [35], while they are still capable of switching to phylogenetically distant hosts. In Eimeria, another class of apicomplexan parasites, their mtDNA changes may be adaptive, driven by complex interactions with their host species [15]. Interestingly, we found that parasites with a broad host range (generalist) tend to share cyt b protein haplotypes with others. In some cases, phylogenetically related generalist lineages shared protein haplotypes (Additional file 1: Fig. S3), which may be largely shaped by the neutral process in the early stage of speciation. Generalist Plasmodium parasites are typically apical in phylogenies [36], thus there is not enough time to accumulate non-synonymous mutations on small evolutionary timescales, leading to little or no differentiation in protein sequences. Besides, we also observed the pattern that phylogenetically distant generalist lineages share protein haplotypes (Additional file 1: Fig. S3). It may be due to the convergent evolution at molecular level and may imply the potential for homoplasy. Although here we did not detect directly relevant adaptive sites in the partial cyt b, we surmise that if there are adaptive sites elsewhere but linked to this fragment, a similar pattern would also appear. It should be noted that sequencing errors of the cyt b barcodes may bias the signal we found here. An overlooked sequencing error will in most cases be assigned as a new lineage and by necessity end up as an artifact. In addition, although the sampling effort has expanded much to include more regions and different host species in recent years, the geographic and host taxonomy sampling bias remains in our dataset and may lead to some underestimation of the host range.

Availability of cyt b as the barcode of avian malaria parasites

Defining taxonomic units is the prerequisite to understanding the distribution, speciation, and transmission [19] of avian malaria parasites. This issue has been under continuous discussion, yet we remain ambiguous about it [37]. At present, owing to the multiple challenges (especially host contamination) in obtaining haemosporidian genomic data [38], cyt b is the most widely used barcode to define avian malaria lineages. A haplotype with one or more nucleotide differences from existing lineages will be defined as new.

Is cyt b still suitable as the barcode of avian malaria parasites after observing the above molecular evolution pattern? On the one hand, we should be cautious that the mutation rate of cyt b in Plasmodium is much slower than in animals in general [39]. Purifying selection sweeps away deleterious mutations and thus reduces the diversity of avian Plasmodium cyt b. In addition, generalist parasites may be under certain evolutionary constraints and seem to have more similarities in their cyt b barcode region than specialist parasites. On the other hand, cyt b has many advantages as a barcode. We did not detect any positively selected sites in the cyt b barcode region. Though cyt b was under strong purifying selection at the protein level, the nucleotide haplotypes show much higher diversity than species based on morphological characters and/or host taxa [18]. For more than half a century, it is generally believed that synonymous mutations are neutral or near neutral, but see [40]. Besides, cyt b gene trees and parasite species trees bear a reasonable correspondence [37]. Taken together, we hold the view that cyt b is still the most useful marker to define lineages at present.

Given the low genetic diversity in cyt b gene, it would be better to delimitate phylogenetic species based on more fast-evolving loci. Thus, we need to employ the whole mitochondrial genome or more novel nuclear markers to better estimate the level of genetic diversity and species phylogenies [27] of avian malaria parasites.

Conclusions

In summary, our work showed that purifying selection is the dominant force in the evolution of the avian Plasmodium cyt b and leads to its low protein diversity. Although the cyt b gene has been considered to be a good marker for finding and typing malaria parasites in general, the impact of using cyt b as a barcode on our understanding of avian malaria diversity remains to be discussed. Our study also provided a new perspective for understanding the vital question ‘What makes a generalist a generalist?’ in malaria research based on the function and evolution of mitochondrial protein. Nevertheless, barcoding sequences are not powerful enough if we want to further understand the evolutionary mechanism of host specificity of haemosporidian parasites. At present, genomic data of avian haemosporidian have proved highly difficult to generate [38] and for the vast majority of lineages, no nuclear genes have been studied. Improvements in sequencing and assembly technology are needed to proceed future genomic data accumulation of a wide range of haemosporidian in an attempt to bring insights into the evolution of avian malaria parasites.

Methods

Data collection

We retrieved all the avian Plasmodium 479-bp lineage sequences from the MalAvi database (v2.5.5, accessed on Nov 7, 2022) [23] and performed data filtering in two steps. First, the sequences of lineages were trimmed to 474-bp by removing the first three and last two nucleotides, because many lineages miss the first nucleotide and the last two nucleotides do not cover a full codon. To ensure the integrity of protein sequences, only lineages with the whole 474-bp sequences were retained. Lineages containing ambiguous bases were considered as unresolved mixed infections and removed from our dataset. Second, nucleotide sequences were translated into amino acid sequences with protozoan mitochondrial genetic code using MEGA v11 [41]. Lineages sharing the same cyt b protein sequence were regarded as having the same cyt b protein haplotype. In this step, five lineages (PIPFAS04, ICTCAY03, ICTCAY04, PASVER01, and PASVER02) with an unexpected stop codon were deleted. Lineages that passed the above screening constitute the final dataset (Additional file 2). The number of avian host species was calculated from the ‘Hosts and Sites Table’ in the MalAvi database.

Sequence polymorphism and protein structure

We visualized the cyt b protein diversity pattern and represented the proportion of different amino acids at each site in all samples using WebLogo (http://weblogo.berkeley.edu) [42]. Sites whose most conserved amino acid accounted for no more than 75% were defined as highly polymorphic sites (HPSs). In order to test whether the amino acid changes in HPSs have an effect on the cyt b protein, we build a three-dimensional protein model of full-length cyt b of Plasmodium relictum and map HPSs onto it in four steps. First, we downloaded the full-length amino acid sequence of Plasmodium relictum (lineage: GRW11) cyt b [GenBank: ATD12902.1] [14] as the reference for mapping and predicted the protein structure using RobeTTaFold (https://robetta.bakerlab.org). This approach uses a three-track neural network and has shown to be one of the best performing public servers for predicting protein structure [43]. Second, the predicted protein structure was then annotated and recolored using Chimera (UCSF, www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimera) [44]. Third, we identified Qo and Qi sites as previously described by [45]. Finally, we marked all the HPSs onto the protein model.

The potential functional effect of amino acid substitutions was assessed by the Protein Variation Effect Analyser (PROVEAN: http://provean.jcvi.org/index.php, [46]. We used the default cutoff “-2.5” for high balanced accuracy. Furthermore, the impact of mutations on protein stability and dynamics was evaluated by the DYNAMUT web server (http://biosig.unimelb.edu.au/dynamut/, [47]). The reconstruction of ancestral sequences was conducted by the FASTML web server (http://fastml.tau.ac.il/) based on the phylogenetic relations between homologous sequences [48].

Selection analysis

Selection at specific amino acid positions was assessed by multiple methods. Sites that had received consistent support in at least two methods can be considered as positively selected sites (PSSs) [31, 32]. As the length of the barcode region is relatively short, the big sequence set would reduce the reliability of the phylogenetic tree, and then affect the accuracy of the selection analysis. Here we extracted 460 lineages of 479-bp as a subsample for selection analysis. Four codon models implemented on the DATAMONKEY web server ( http://www.datamonkey.org/) [49] were used to assess codons under positive or purifying selection, including Single Likelihood Ancestral Counting (SLAC) [50], Fast Unconstrained Bayesian AppRoximation (FUBAR) [51], Fixed Effects Likelihood (FEL) and Mixed Effects Model of Evolution (MEME) [52]. The GTR model was used as the best substitution model in the above tests. Furthermore, we calculated the ratio of non-synonymous (dN) to synonymous sites (dS) using the site model of CodeML, implemented in PAML 4.9 [53]. The following six models were compared in pairs by Likelihood-ratio tests (LRT): M0 (one ω ratio), M1a (nearly neutral), M2a (positive selection), M3 (discrete), M7 (beta), and M8 (beta & ω). The Bayes empirical Bayes (BEB) was used to identify sites under positive selection [54].

The Bayesian tree used in the selection tests was reconstructed using BEAST v2.6.0 [55], applying the model GTR + G, which was suggested as fit best for the dataset in jModelTest v2.1.10 [56] according to the Bayesian inference criterion (BIC). The Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) was set to ten initialization attempts, with the length of the chain as 1 × 108 and tree log parameters as every 1 × 104 generations. Tracer v1.7.1 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/) was used to measure the convergence of MCMC chains. After deleting the first 1,000 trees as burn-in, the maximum credibility tree was estimated by TreeAnotator v1.7.5 and visualized in Figtree v1.4.4 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/). In addition, TCS haplotype networks [57] of lineages that had identified morphological species were processed by PopART v1.7 software [58].

Statistical analysis

Basic data collation was implemented through Microsoft Excel and Python scripts. To explore the relationship between host range and the diversity of protein haplotypes of avian malaria lineages, we first visualized the correspondence between lineages and their protein haplotypes using Sankey diagrams by SankeyMATIC (https://sankeymatic.com/build/). Then, a point-biserial correlation was calculated using the built-in function cor. test() in R v. 4.0.3 (https://www.r-project.org), to test whether lineages with a wider host range tend to share cyt b protein haplotypes with other lineages. Lineages exclusively obtained from insects (n = 119) were excluded from this analysis as they lack information on avian hosts. The independent variable was continuous which represented the host range of an avian malaria lineage. The dependent variable was binary: lineages that share protein haplotypes with others were defined as ‘1’, while those having unique protein haplotypes were defined as ‘0’.

Availability of data and materials

Original datasets are freely available via Malavi (http://130.235.244.92/Malavi/). The accession number of lineages in the final dataset is available via Additional file 2.

Abbreviations

BEB:

Bayes Empirical Bayes

BIC:

Bayesian inference criterion

cox1 :

Cytochrome oxidase 1

cox3 :

Cytochrome oxidase 3

cyt b:

Cytochrome B

dN:

Number of non-synonymous substitutions per non-synonymous sites

dS:

Numbers of synonymous substitutions per synonymous sites

ETC:

Electron transport chain

FEL:

Fixed Effects Likelihood

FUBAR:

Fast Unconstrained Bayesian AppRoximation

GTR:

General Time Reversible

HPSs:

Highly polymorphic sites

LRT:

Likelihood ratio test

MEME:

Mixed Effects Model of Evolution

MIM:

Mitochondrial inner membrane

mtDNA:

Mitochondrial DNA

PSSs:

Positively selected sites

Qo :

Ubiquinol oxidation site

Qi :

Ubiquinone reduction site

SLAC:

Single Likelihood Ancestral Counting

References

  1. Feagin JE. Mitochondrial genome diversity in parasites. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30:371–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aldritt SM, Joseph JT, Wirth DF. Sequence identification of cytochrome b in Plasmodium gallinaceum. Mol Cell Biol. 1989;9:3614–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vaidya AB, Akella R, Suplick K. Sequences similar to genes for two mitochondrial proteins and portions of ribosomal RNA in tandemly arrayed 6-kilobase-pair DNA of a malarial parasite. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1989;35:97–107.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gray MW, Lang BF, Burger G. Mitochondria of protists. Annu Rev Genet. 2004;38:477–524.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Slamovits CH, Saldarriaga JF, Larocque A, Keeling PJ. The highly reduced and fragmented mitochondrial genome of the early-branching dinoflagellate Oxyrrhis marina shares characteristics with both apicomplexan and dinoflagellate mitochondrial genomes. J Mol Biol. 2007;372:356–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Painter HJ, Morrisey JM, Mather MW, Vaidya AB. Specific role of mitochondrial electron transport in blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum. Nature. 2007;446:88–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. van Dooren GG, Stimmler LM, McFadden GI. Metabolic maps and functions of the Plasmodium mitochondrion. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2006;30:596–630.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Crofts AR. The cytochrome bc1 complex: function in the context of structure. Annu Rev Physiol. 2004;66:689–733.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vaidya AB, Mather MW. Mitochondrial evolution and functions in malaria parasites. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2009;63:249–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nabholz B, Glemin S, Galtier N. Strong variations of mitochondrial mutation rate across mammals–the longevity hypothesis. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:120–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. William J, Ballard O, Kreitman M. Is Mitochondrial-DNA a Strictly Neutral Marker. Trends Ecol Evol. 1995;10:485–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Outlaw DC, Ricklefs RE. Comparative gene evolution in haemosporidian (apicomplexa) parasites of birds and mammals. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27:537–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Outlaw RK, Counterman B, Outlaw DC. Differential patterns of molecular evolution among Haemosporidian parasite groups. Parasitology. 2015;142:612–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pacheco MA, Matta NE, Valkiunas G, Parker PG, Mello B, Stanley CE Jr, Lentino M, Garcia-Amado MA, Cranfield M, Kosakovsky Pond SL, et al. Mode and Rate of Evolution of Haemosporidian Mitochondrial Genomes: Timing the Radiation of Avian Parasites. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:383–403.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Awadi A. Host species and pathogenicity effects in the evolution of the mitochondrial genomes of Eimeria species (Apicomplexa; Coccidia; Eimeriidae). J Biol Res (Thessalon). 2017;24:13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fecchio A, Chagas CRF, Bell JA, Kirchgatter K. Evolutionary ecology, taxonomy, and systematics of avian malaria and related parasites. Acta Trop. 2020;204: 105364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Clark NJ, Clegg SM, Lima MR. A review of global diversity in avian haemosporidians (Plasmodium and Haemoproteus: Haemosporida): new insights from molecular data. Int J Parasitol. 2014;44:329–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Valkiunas G. Avian malaria parasites and other haemosporidia. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Fecchio A, Clark NJ, Bell JA, Skeen HR, Lutz HL, De la Torre GM, Vaughan JA, Tkach VV, Schunck F, Ferreira FC, et al. Global drivers of avian haemosporidian infections vary across zoogeographical regions. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2021;30:2393–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Asghar M, Hasselquist D, Hansson B, Zehtindjiev P, Westerdahl H, Bensch S. Chronic infection. Hidden costs of infection: chronic malaria accelerates telomere degradation and senescence in wild birds. Science. 2015;347:436–438.

  21. Bensch S, Stjernman M, Hasselquist D, Ostman O, Hansson B, Westerdahl H, Pinheiro RT. Host specificity in avian blood parasites: a study of Plasmodium and Haemoproteus mitochondrial DNA amplified from birds. Proc Biol Sci. 2000;267:1583–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hellgren O, Waldenstrom J, Bensch S. A new PCR assay for simultaneous studies of Leucocytozoon, Plasmodium, and Haemoproteus from avian blood. J Parasitol. 2004;90:797–802.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bensch S, Hellgren O, Perez-Tris J. MalAvi: a public database of malaria parasites and related haemosporidians in avian hosts based on mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages. Mol Ecol Resour. 2009;9:1353–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Galen SC, Nunes R, Sweet PR, Perkins SL. Integrating coalescent species delimitation with analysis of host specificity reveals extensive cryptic diversity despite minimal mitochondrial divergence in the malaria parasite genus Leucocytozoon. BMC Evol Biol. 2018;18:128.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang X, Rapsevicius P, Chapa-Vargas L, Hellgren O, Bensch S. Within-Lineage Divergence of Avian Haemosporidians: A Case Study to Reveal the Origin of a Widespread Haemoproteus Parasite. J Parasitol. 2019;105:414–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hellgren O, Perez-Tris J, Bensch S. A jack-of-all-trades and still a master of some: prevalence and host range in avian malaria and related blood parasites. Ecology. 2009;90:2840–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nilsson E, Taubert H, Hellgren O, Huang X, Palinauskas V, Markovets MY, Valkiunas G, Bensch S. Multiple cryptic species of sympatric generalists within the avian blood parasite Haemoproteus majoris. J Evolution Biol. 2016;29:1812–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Warner RE. The Role of Introduced Diseases in the Extinction of the Endemic Hawaiian Avifauna. The Condor. 1968;70:101–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vanriper C, Vanriper SG, Goff ML, Laird M. The Epizootiology and Ecological Significance of Malaria in Hawaiian Land Birds. Ecol Monogr. 1986;56:327–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lane KD, Mu J, Lu J, Windle ST, Liu A, Sun PD, Wellems TE. Selection of Plasmodium falciparum cytochrome B mutants by putative PfNDH2 inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:6285–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Melo-Ferreira J, Vilela J, Fonseca MM, da Fonseca RR, Boursot P, Alves PC. The elusive nature of adaptive mitochondrial DNA evolution of an arctic lineage prone to frequent introgression. Genome Biol Evol. 2014;6:886–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Awadi A, Ben Slimen H, Schaschl H, Knauer F, Suchentrunk F. Positive selection on two mitochondrial coding genes and adaptation signals in hares (genus Lepus) from China. BMC Ecol Evol. 2021;21:100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Danne JC, Gornik SG, Macrae JI, McConville MJ, Waller RF. Alveolate mitochondrial metabolic evolution: dinoflagellates force reassessment of the role of parasitism as a driver of change in apicomplexans. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:123–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chang HH, Moss EL, Park DJ, Ndiaye D, Mboup S, Volkman SK, Sabeti PC, Wirth DF, Neafsey DE, Hartl DL. Malaria life cycle intensifies both natural selection and random genetic drift. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:20129–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. de Angeli Dutra D, Fecchio A, Braga ÉM, Poulin R. Migratory behaviour does not alter cophylogenetic congruence between avian hosts and their haemosporidian parasites. Parasitology. 2022;149:905–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nylin S, Agosta S, Bensch S, Boeger WA, Braga MP, Brooks DR, Forister ML, Hamback PA, Hoberg EP, Nyman T, et al. Embracing Colonizations: A New Paradigm for Species Association Dynamics. Trends Ecol Evol. 2018;33:4–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Outlaw DC, Ricklefs RE. Species limits in avian malaria parasites (Haemosporida): how to move forward in the molecular era. Parasitology. 2014;141:1223–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Videvall E. Genomic Advances in Avian Malaria Research. Trends Parasitol. 2019;35:254–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Bensch S, Hellgren O, Krizanauskiene A, Palinauskas V, Valkiunas G, Outlaw D, Ricklefs RE. How can we determine the molecular clock of malaria parasites? Trends Parasitol. 2013;29:363–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Shen X, Song S, Li C, Zhang J. Synonymous mutations in representative yeast genes are mostly strongly non-neutral. Nature. 2022;606:725–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Stecher G, Tamura K, Kumar S. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) for macOS. Mol Biol Evol. 2020;37:1237–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE. WebLogo: A sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 2004;14:1188–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Baek M, DiMaio F, Anishchenko I, Dauparas J, Ovchinnikov S, Lee GR, Wang J, Cong Q, Kinch LN, Schaeffer RD, et al. Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network. Science. 2021;373:871–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem. 2004;25:1605–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Vaidya AB, Lashgari MS, Pologe LG, Morrisey J. Structural features of Plasmodium cytochrome b that may underlie susceptibility to 8-aminoquinolines and hydroxynaphthoquinones. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993;58:33–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Choi Y, Chan AP. PROVEAN web server: a tool to predict the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:2745–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Rodrigues CH, Pires DE, Ascher DB. DynaMut: predicting the impact of mutations on protein conformation, flexibility and stability. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W350–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Moshe A, Pupko T. Ancestral sequence reconstruction: accounting for structural information by averaging over replacement matrices. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:2562–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Weaver S, Shank SD, Spielman SJ, Li M, Muse SV, Kosakovsky Pond SL. Datamonkey 2.0: A Modern Web Application for Characterizing Selective and Other Evolutionary Processes. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:773–777.

  50. Kosakovsky Pond SL, Frost SDW. Not So Different After All: A Comparison of Methods for Detecting Amino Acid Sites Under Selection. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;22:1208–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Murrell B, Moola S, Mabona A, Weighill T, Sheward D, Kosakovsky Pond SL, Scheffler K. FUBAR: a fast, unconstrained bayesian approximation for inferring selection. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:1196–205.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Murrell B, Wertheim JO, Moola S, Weighill T, Scheffler K, Kosakovsky Pond SL. Detecting individual sites subject to episodic diversifying selection. PLoS Genet. 2012;8: e1002764.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Yang Z. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:1586–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Yang Z, Wong WS, Nielsen R. Bayes empirical bayes inference of amino acid sites under positive selection. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;22:1107–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol. 2007;7:214.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 2012;9:772.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Clement MJ, Snell Q, Walker P, Posada D, Crandall KA: TCS: Estimating Gene Genealogies. In: 16th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS 2002), 15–19 April 2002, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, CD-ROM/Abstracts Proceedings: 2002.

  58. Leigh JW, Bryant D. POPART: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol Evol. 2015;6:1110–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Yi Zhao of Tsinghua University for his support in programming.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key Program of Research and Development (2022YFC2303803), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.31772444 and No. 32170418 to LD, No. 32000292 to XH). The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, interpretation of data, and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MOE Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China

    Xinyi Wang, Xi Huang & Lu Dong

  2. Department of Biology, Molecular Ecology and Evolution Laboratory, Lund University, Ecology Building, 223 62, Lund, SE, Sweden

    Staffan Bensch

Authors
  1. Xinyi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Staffan Bensch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xi Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lu Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.D. and X.W. conceived the investigation. X.W. performed the statistical analysis and wrote the manuscript with the help from S.B., L.D., and X.H.. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lu Dong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

The frequency of the dominating amino acid at each amino acid site of 474-bp cyt b (the first amino acid was trimmed, see methods). The plot is based on sequences of all 1,089 avian Plasmodium lineages. HPSs are highlighted in pink. Figure S2. The correspondence between cyt b (right side) and their protein haplotypes (left side) of avian malaria parasites. The thickness of the line indicates the size of host range. Figure S3. A sub-clade of the avian malaria lineages that share the same protein haplotype (pCYTB1) by phylogenetically related lineages (ALARV04, GRW04, GRW11, PHCOL01, and SGS1) and a distant lineage (SW5). Table S1. Results of PAML analyses testing for selection on the 479-bp cyt b.

Additional file 2.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Bensch, S., Huang, X. et al. Purifying selection leads to low protein diversity of the mitochondrial cyt b gene in avian malaria parasites. BMC Ecol Evo 23, 49 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12862-023-02155-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12862-023-02155-5

Keywords

BMC Ecology and Evolution

ISSN: 2730-7182

Contact us