Skip to main content
Download PDF

Plant community analysis along environmental gradients in moist afromontane forest of Gerba Dima, South-western Ethiopia

BMC Ecology and Evolution volume 22, Article number: 12 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

This study was carried out in Gerba Dima Forest, South-Western Ethiopia, to determine the floristic composition, species diversity and community types along environmental gradients. Identifying and interpreting the structure of species assemblages is the main goal of plant community ecology. Investigation of forest community composition and structure is very useful in understanding the status of tree population, regeneration, and diversity for conservation purposes.

Method

Ninety sample plots having a size of 25 × 25 m (625 m2) were laid by employing stratified random sampling. Nested plots were used to sample plants of different sizes and different environmental variables. All woody plant species with Diameter at breast height (DBH) ≥ 2.5 cm and height ≥ 1.5 m were recorded in 25 m × 25 m plots. Hierarchical (agglomerative) cluster analysis was performed using the free statistical software R version 3.6.1 using package cluster to classify the vegetation into plant community types. Redundancy Analysis (RDA) ordination was used in describing the pattern of plant communities along an environmental gradient.

Result

One hundred and eighty plant species belonging to 145 genera, 69 families and comprising of 15 endemic species were recorded. Of these, 52 species (28.9%) were trees, 6 species (3.33%) were Trees/shrubs, 31 species (17.22%) were shrubs, 76 species (42.22%) were herbs, and 15 species (8.33%) were Lianas. Rubiaceae, Acanthaceae and Asteraceae were the richest family each represented by 11 genera and 11 species (6.11%), 9 genera and 11 species (6.11%), 6 genera and 11 species (6.11%), respectively of total floristic composition. Cluster analysis resulted in five different plant communities and this result was supported by the ordination result. RDA result showed altitude was the main environmental variable in determining the plant communities. The ANOVA test indicated that the five community types differ significantly from each other with regard to Electrical Conductivity and Potassium.

Conclusions

Description of floristic diversity of species in Gerba Dima forest revealed the presence of high species diversity and richness. The presence of endemic plant species in the study forest shows the potential of the area for biodiversity conservation.

Peer Review reports

Background

Identifying and interpreting the structure of species assemblages is the main goal of plant community ecology. Gradients in species composition vis-à-vis either presence/absence or abundance data are commonly employed to evaluate community structure [1]. Legendre [2] distinguished between ‘true gradients’ in species composition, which are induced by environmental gradients, and ‘false gradients’, which may arise even in the absence of environmental heterogeneity as a result of biotic interactions within the community. Both true and false gradients may form distinct spatial patterns when mapped into geographic space. According to Seabloom et al. [3], different ecological processes create distinct spatial patterns, so that specific processes could be identified from their spatial signature. Hence, spatial analysis of community structure is of direct scientific interest, because spatial structures may be critical for identifying and understanding the underlying ecological processes [4]. Biotic filters determining limiting similarity is the assumed cause for species dissimilarity in traits within communities. Symmetric competitive interactions might indeed lead to the co-existence of ecologically distinct species, which minimize competition for shared resources (“symmetric competition” leading to limiting similarity [5].

The quest to explain the underlying processes for the assembly of local communities is still a major focus in plant community ecology, as researchers keep examining them through both observational and experimental studies [6]. The multidimensional ecological niche space determines the distribution of a species within a community [7]. Physiographic and edaphic factors can determine which plant species will colonize a site since plant species vary in their tolerance and utilization of resources site [8]. These variations have been regarded as a driving force for the coexistence of species in a similar environment [9] and can explain broad-scale compositional differences among multiple resource gradients [10, 11]. The upper storey tree density as an abiotic factor can also affect community composition as understorey species differ in their ability to tolerate stresses imposed by competitive trees [12, 13]. Moreover, by increasing the abundance of annual and biennial plants, disturbances can affect community composition via favouring stress-tolerant species [13, 14].

Information on species composition and diversity of tree species plays a pivotal role not only to understand the structure of a forest community but also in planning and implementation of conservation strategy of the community [15]. Investigation of forest community composition and structure is very useful in understanding the status of tree population, regeneration, and diversity for conservation purposes [16]. Quantitative information on composition, distribution, and abundance of woody species has paramount importance in understanding the form and structure of a forest community and for planning and implementation of conservation strategy of the community.

The recent data on forest resources of Ethiopia reported in FAO [17] puts Ethiopia among countries with a forest cover of 10–30%. According to this report, Ethiopia’s forest cover (FAO definition) is 12.2 million ha (11%). It further indicated that the forest cover shows a decline from 15.11 million ha in 1990 to 12.2 million ha in 2010, during which 2.65% of the forest cover was deforested. This study was conducted in the Gerba Dima forest found in South-Western Ethiopia with the aim of investigating the species composition, species diversity, community types and to relate the distribution of plant community types to some environmental parameters.

Methods

The study area

This study was carried out in the Gerba Dima forest found in the Illu Aba Bora zone of Oromia regional state of Ethiopia and located between 7° 45' to 8° 10' North latitude and 35° 29' to 35° 50' East longitude. The study forest is bounded by Baro River to the south and west direction whiles three other rivers, namely Bote, Hoyi and Sor cross part of the forest in the east (Fig. 1). The geology of the study site is characterized by the Underlying basement rock consisting of intensively folded and faulted Precambrian rocks, overlain by Mesozoic marine strata and Tertiary basalt types [18]. The main soil types of the study area are red or brownish ferrisols derived from the volcanic parent material. Other soil groups in the area include nitosols, acrisols, vertisols, and cambisols soil types exist in the study site [19].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of Ethiopia, Oromia region and Gerba Dima forest

Full size image

The rainfall data collected from the nearest Gore meteorological station to the study forest indicated that the study area receives very high annual rainfall and characterized by unimodal rainfall pattern, which shows low rainfall in December, January and February, gradually increasing to the peak period in August. The mean annual rainfall of 1854 mm while the monthly mean maximum and mean minimum temperature of the area is 27.2 ℃ and 13.3 ℃, respectively. The mean annual temperature is 19.2 ℃ and with slight variation from year to year [20].

The vegetation type at Gerba Dima is part of the moist evergreen afromontane forest with characteristic emergent species that form the upper canopy includes Pouteria adolfi-friederici (Fig. 2). Albizia gummifera, A. schimperiana, A. grandibracteata, Sapium ellipticum, Euphorbia ampliphylla, Ekebergia capensis, Ficus sur, Hallea rubrostipulata, Ocotea kenyensis, Olea welwitschii, Polyscias fulva and Schefflera abyssinica are other characteristic species of this vegetation type [21].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Photograph illustrating the forest overview

Full size image

Sampling method

In this study, a stratified random sampling design was used to collect vegetation and environmental data [1, 22]. Using Arc GIS version 10.3, the study forest was stratified based on the altitudinal gradient and three types of strata in the form of contour were established. Strata one was distributed between 1500 and 1800 m altitudinal ranges whereas strata two and three were found between 1801–2000 m and 2001–2300 m altitudinal ranges respectively (Fig. 1). Sample plots were assigned in each contour in the form of Random points Using Arc GIS version 10.3 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

A Map showing the distribution of sample plots

Full size image

Ninety sample plots having a size of 25 × 25 m (625 m2) along each contour were laid. Nested plots were used to sample plants of different sizes and different environmental variables. All woody plant species with Diameter at breast height (DBH) ≥ 2.5 cm and height ≥ 1.5 m were recorded in 25 m × 25 m plots. Within the major plots, five 3 m × 3 m subplots (9m2) was used to collect shrubs with dbh < 2.5 cm and > 1.5 m height. Within each 9 m2 subplots, two 1 m2 subplots were used to collect data on the species and abundance of herbaceous plants. Finally, the percent cover of all plant species found within the sample plot was visually estimated and converted to the Braun-Blanquet scale as modified by [23]. Every plant species encountered in each plot were recorded. Plant specimens were collected, pressed, dried and brought to the National Herbarium (ETH), Addis Ababa University for taxonomic identification. The specimens were determined by comparing with authenticated specimens housed at ETH and by referring to published volumes of Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32].

Physiographical variables, namely altitude, geographic coordinates, slope and aspect, were recorded for each quadrat using GPS, Clinometer and Compass respectively. The values for aspect were codified based on Woldu [33], where N = 0, NE = 1, E = 2, SE = 3, S = 4, SW = 3.25, W = 2.5, NW = 1.25 before analysis. For each sample plot, a disturbance was determined on the basis of a five point scale following [34]. The five scales of disturbance scores were based on visible signs of tree cutting, grazing and presence of beehives. The points of scale were 0 = (No disturbance), 1 = (0–20% of the quadrat disturbed), 2 = (21–40% of the quadrat disturbed), 3 = (41–60% of the quadrat disturbed), 4 = (61- 80% of the quadrat disturbed), 5 = (81–100% of the quadrat disturbed).

For analysing soil variables, soil samples were collected with a soil core sampler from the top 40 cm depth within 1 m × 1 m subplots at the four corners and middle of the quadrat. Composite soil samples from samples collected from the four corners and the middle of quadrats were brought to the soil laboratories of Addis Ababa University (AAU). The soil samples were air-dried, rolled and passed through a 2 mm sieve for laboratory analyses. These soil samples were analysed for pH, electrical conductivity (EC), sodium, potassium, organic matter, total nitrogen, available phosphorus and texture following standard procedures outlined in [35]. The pH and EC were measured using a pH meter and EC meter in the supernatant suspension of 1:2.5 soil–distilled water mixtures. Available Sodium and Potassium were determined using a flame photometer. Organic matter was determined by the ignition method. The texture was determined on the basis of Bouycous Hydrometer method with the categories sand, silt, and clay (expressed as % weight) while total nitrogen was determined using Kjeldhal method. Available Phosphorus was determined by the Bray-I method and the absorbance of the Bray-I extract is measured at 882 nm in a spectrophotometer.

Data analysis

In this study, hierarchical (agglomerative) cluster analysis was performed using the free statistical software R version 3.6.1 [36] using package cluster to classify the vegetation into plant community types. The similarity ratio with Ward's group linkage method was applied for cluster analysis i.e. to determine plots that can be classified into the same groups based on the species abundance data. The decision on the number of groups (clusters) was based on objective methods of obtaining an optimal number of clusters, the Multi Response Permutation Procedures (MRPP) technique (no-difference hypothesis) and the ecological interpretation of the groups conducted in R program. The T and A statistic of MRPP output were used to obtain the number of clusters. The test statistic T describes the separation between the groups. The more negative T value, the stronger the separation. The P-value associated with T is determined by numerical integration of the Pearson type III distribution. The P-value is useful for evaluating how likely an observed difference is due to chance [37]. The agreement statistic A describes within-group homogeneity, compared to the random expectation, and falls between 0 and 1. When all items within-groups are identical A = 1 and 0 if the groups are heterogeneous. In community ecology, A values are commonly below 0.1, and an A value greater 0.3 is fairly high [37].

From the output of the objective method, a sharp bend at the specific cluster in the plot could be a good indication of the number of clusters in the data [38]. The community types identified from the cluster analysis were further refined in a synoptic table where species occurrences were summarized as synoptic cover-abundance values [39]. Dominant species of each community type were identified based on their synoptic values and community types were named after one or more dominant species. The identified groups were tested for the hypothesis of no difference between the groups (clusters) using nonparametric Multi-Response Permutation Procedure (MRPP). Indicator species analysis was performed in R using package labdsv. Indicator values were tested for statistical significance using a randomization (Monte Carlo) technique. Species richness, evenness, Shannon diversity and evenness indices were computed using the free statistical software R version 3.6.1 [36]. The Shannon diversity index (H') was calculated from the equation:

$$H^{\prime} = - \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{s} {pi\,ln pi}$$

where pi, is the proportion of individuals found in the ith species. The values of the Shannon diversity index is usually found to fall between 1.5 and 3.5 and only rarely surpasses 4.5 [1, 39]. The Shannon evenness index (J) was calculated from the ratio of observed diversity to maximum diversity using the equation:

$$J = \frac{{H^{\prime}}}{H\,max} = \frac{{H^{\prime}}}{ln\,s}$$

where Hmax is the maximum level of diversity possible within a given population, which equals ln (number of species). J is normal between 0 and 1, and with 1 representing a situation in which all species are equally abundant [40].

Information about endemic species, their habit, IUCN status and geographical distributions was determined by referring to [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33, 42].

In this study, Redundancy Analysis (RDA) ordination was used in describing the pattern of plant communities along an environmental gradient since the preliminary analysis of the vegetation data using Deterended Correspondence Analysis (DCA) revealed that the longest axis of DCA for the dataset was less than 3 (= 2.22). Before the application of RDA ordination, environmental variables, which were relatively more important in explaining the species data, were selected using the Monte Carlo technique and function Adonis test for their significance. Computation of variance inflation factor (vif) was also conducted to eliminate those environmental variables that are collinear. The community types obtained were subjected to an ANOVA based on environmental variables to find out whether there are significant variations between the groups. Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate the relationship between the environmental variables.

Results

Floristic composition

One hundred and eighty (180) plant species belonging to 145 genera and 69 families were recorded and identified in the sample plots in the Gerba Dima forest (Table 1). Of these, 52 species (28.9%) were trees, 6 species (3.33%) were Trees/shrubs, 31 species (17.22%) were shrubs, 76 species (42.22%) were herbs, and 15 species (8.33%) were Lianas. Angiosperms were represented by 160 species while the rest 20 species were Pteridophytes. Among Angiosperms, Rubiaceae, Acanthaceae and Asteraceae were the richest family each represented by 11 genera and 11 species (6.11%), 9 genera and 11 species (6.11%), 6 genera and 11 species (6.11%), respectively of total floristic composition, followed by Fabaceae 8 genera and 9 species (5%), Euphorbiaceae 6 genera and 7 species (3.89%). The remaining families represented less than 3% of species each. Eleven families, 13 genera and 20 species represented pteridophytes. Aspleniaceae, Dryopteridaceae and Pteridaceae were the richest Pteridophytes represented by 6, 3 and 2 species respectively. The genus Vernonia, Ficus, Asparagus, Dracaena were represented by 5,4,3,3 species respectively and Aframomum, Albizia, Asparagus, Cyperus, Euphorbia, Hippocratea, Hypoestes, Justicia, Maytenus, Olea, Peperomia, Polyscias, Pteris, Rubus, Schefflera, Solanecio, Solanum, Tacazzea, and Zehneria were represented by 2 species each and the rest genera contained a single species each.

Table 1 List of species in Gerba Dima Forest
Full size table

Based on the information available on the published Floras of Ethiopia a total of 15 endemic plant species in 11 families were recorded (Table 2), comprising more than 8.33% of the recorded species. Asteraceae was the first family having three endemic species, followed by Acanthaceae and Fabaceae (two species each). The remaining eight families have a single species each in the endemic species list. Among the total endemic species, herb, tree, shrub and liana growth forms were represented by 6,3,4,2 species respectively. Out of the 15 endemic species, Crotalaria rosenii and Polyscias farinosa have been included in the IUCN red data list of Ethiopia and Eritrea qualifying for near threatened and vulnerable category respectively. In the Gerba Dima forest, at 625 m2 sample plot, species richness varied from 26 to 59 across the study plots. The Shannon diversity index also varied from 2.92 to 3.83 while evenness ranged from 0.89 to 0.95 in the study plots. The overall mean Shannon diversity index, species richness and evenness of the study area were 3.45, 41 and 0.93 respectively.

Table 2 Endemic species, their habit, IUCN status and geographical distributions
Full size table

Community types and indicator species

Five community types were derived from the hierarchical cluster analysis in combination with Multi-response Permutation Procedures (MRPP) and objective method of the whole data set (Fig. 4 and Table 3). From the output of MRPP, the test statistic T value for the five groups was −38.26 (P < 0.001) and the agreement statistic A was 0.13 while the output of objective method revealed a sharp bend at the fifth cluster.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Dendrogram of the cluster analysis results of species abundance found in 90 plots

Full size image
Table 3 Synoptic cover value of plant in Gerba Dima Forest for species reaching ≥ 1% in at least one community
Full size table

Community 1 (Croton macrostachyus—Bersama abyssinica community) was found in the altitudinal range of 1677–2020 m. a.s.l and slope from flat to 50%. Fourteen plots were associated with the community and has 2 indicator species with significant indicator values (P < 0.05) (Table 4).

Table 4 Indicator species of clusters in Gerba Dima forest with their significant P-value
Full size table

Community 2 (Syzygium guineense—Olea capensis community) was distributed from 1699 to 2240 m a.s.l. and slope ranging from flat to 60%. It comprises of 22 plots and twenty species were associated with this community as indicator species where one of the indicator species exhibit significant indicator values (P < 0.05) (Table 4).

Community 3 (Dracaena afromontana- Pouteria adolfi-friederici community) was found in the altitudinal range of 1761–2000 m. a.s.l and slope from flat to 25%. Thirteen plots were associated with the community community and seven species were associated with this community as indicator species while two of the indicator species showed significant indicator values (P < 0.05) (Table 4).

Community 4 (Vepris dainellii—Schefflera abyssinica community) was distributed in the altitude range of 1720–2060 m a.s.l. and the slope gradient varies flat to 60%. It comprised of 14 plots, eight species were associated with this community as indicator species, while four of the indicator species exhibited significant indicator values (P < 0.05) (Table 4).

Community 5 (Albizia gummifera—Millettia ferruginea community) was found in the altitudinal range of 1728–2014 m. a.s.l and slope from flat to 50%. Twenty-seven plots were associated to the community. Eight species are associated with this community as indicator species and four of the indicator species exhibited significant indicator values (P < 0.05) (Table 4).

From computation of vegetation data in the study area Shannon-Weiner diversity and evenness, indices for the five community types showed the output in Table 5.

Table 5 Species richness, evenness and diversity indices of plant community types
Full size table

Relationship between community types and environmental factors

Heterogeneity or homogeneity of vegetation data test using DCA resulted in short length (gradient) of DCA first axis i.e., < 3 (2.22) which indicate the presence of lower species turnover or homogeneous vegetation data due to the linear relationship between species and environmental variables. The result of Monte Carlo test showed that out of 14 environmental variables, seven were found to be significant in explaining patterns of plant community distribution. From the seven significant environmental factors, the vif values of sand and silt were higher than 5. Sand and Silt are highly correlated with at least one of the other variables in the model. One solution in dealing with collinearity is to remove some of the violating variables from the model and thus the one with higher vif value (sand) was eliminated. The result of RDA ordination showed that comparatively, the gradient of altitude and potassium was highly correlated on axis one and gradient of disturbance in axis two. The other factors were correlated with the five axes with a different value of correlation. The eigenvalue for axis one, two and three were 10.65, 8.06, and 6.32 respectively. Cumulative proportion variance explained by the first five RDA axis of the joint biplot was 93.9%. The proportion of variation explained by five RDA axis also shows a decline towards the successive higher axis (Table 6).

Table 6 Biplot score for constraining variables and their correlation with the RDA axis, eigenvalues and proportion of variance explained
Full size table

RDA ordination of the study plots of Gerba Dima forest formed five groups or community based on the species composition. These five community types were segregated following the arrows of the environmental variables. Community 3 and community 4 are found in mid altitude area. Community two mostly occur at the higher altitude while species in community 1 and community 5 are distributed at the lower altitude and higher EC. Silt, Disturbance and potassium axes were strongly influencing the distribution of community five. Organic matter arrow has strongly influenced the distribution of species in community three and four (Fig. 5). The ANOVA test indicated that the five community types differ significantly from each other with regard to EC and K. The result of Tukey’s pair-wise comparison test indicates that community 4 and 1 differ significantly with respect to Disturbance and K while community 2 and 3 showed significant differences with respect to EC.

Fig. 5
figure 5

RDA ordination biplot of 90 quadrats and 6 environmental variables of plant communities

Full size image

Discussion

Floristic composition and diversity of Gerba Dima forest

The existence of diversified flora of Gerba Dima forest was in line with the general pattern of high species diversity in the tropical montane forests. According to Gentry [42], tropical forests are among ecosystems that harbour high species diversity of the globe. East African montane forests of Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda are among the most diverse and richest African regions with regard to flora composition and endemic plant taxa [43,44,45]. Asteraceae, Acanthaceae, Rubiaceae, Fabaceae and Euphorbiaceae are the five dominant families, which contribute more than 27% of the total species in the study forest. These dominant families were also reported as top ten species rich families in many Neotropical forests and Asia [42]. Except for Rubiaceae, these families are also among the top ten species rich families in the flora area [46]. The dominance of the above families together with Rubiaceae was also reported in other moist afromontane forests of southwestern Ethiopia [47,48,49]. Thus, the dominance of these families in the Gerba Dima forest agreed to their general dominance in the flora area and tropical forests. The dominance of these families in the study area could be attributed to their successful colonization to the landscape owing to their efficient pollination, dispersal and germination mechanisms [50]. For instance, many species of Asteraceae have umbrella shape structures adapted for air dispersal and increase their opportunity for their successful establishment [50].

Among the growth forms, herbs constitute more than 42% of recorded species. The prevalence of herbs could be attributed to the presence of canopy gap because of anthropogenic disturbance. Disturbance of forest in the form of selective cutting of trees favours the growth of herbaceous species in the forest understory. Under normal circumstances, the forest floor (herbaceous layer) of Afromontane rainforests is usually dark and poor in species composition owing to the closed canopy of the forest that prevents light from reaching the ground [51].

The higher value of Shannon diversity index and evenness indicates that the study forest has high species diversity with more even distribution of the species within the study plots. Species diversity increases when the populations have more even abundances and vice versa [40]. High Shannon evenness in the Gerba Dima forest indicates little dominance by any single species but the repeated coexistence of species over all the plots or sites. Therefore, the implication of evenness values is that, when there is a high evenness value in a given forest, the location of conservation sites might not be of much importance compared to when the evenness value of the forest is low.

To give a general impression of the species richness of Gerba Dima Forest, the results of the present study were compared with results from other Moist Afromontane forests in Ethiopia. The species richness of Gerba Dima forest is higher than some moist afromontane forest of Ethiopia such as Masha forest (130 species) [48], Belete forest (157 species) [52], Gelesha forest (157 species) [53], Agama forest (162 species) [49] and more or less similar in species richness with some other moist afromontane forest of Ethiopia such as Komto forest (180 species) [54] and Jibat forest (183 species) [55]. However, the species richness of Gerba Dima forest was much lower than the values reported for few other moist afromontane forest of Ethiopia which include Bonga forest (243 species) [47], Yayu forest (220 species) [56] Mana Angetu forest (212 species) [57] (Magada forest (197 species) [58] and Gesha and Sayilem forest (300 species [59].

The difference in species richness among the compared forests could be attributed to the variations of forest sites with regard to geographical location, altitude, anthropogenic impact, rainfall and other climatic, physiographic and edaphic factors [60, 61]. Climatic and physiographic factors have a wide range of effect on the diversity of plant species across the land escape whereas suitable environmental conditions and biotic factors influence diversity at the site level [62, 63]. Species composition of forests is also influenced by regeneration success and competition among species [64].

Plant community types in Gerba Dima forest

The output of Multi-response Permutation Procedures (MRPP) results in T statistics having more negative value with significant P-value (T = − 38.26, P < 0.001) and an agreement statistic A (0.13) confirming the distinctness of clusters. The test statistic T describes the separation between the groups. The more negative T value, the stronger the separation. From the result of this study, the null hypothesis of no difference among groups can be rejected. The five groups occupy different regions of species space, as shown by the strong chance correction within the group (A) and test statistic (T) and thus confirm the existence of 5 distinct plant communities in the Gerba Dima forest [37]. The five plant communities showed a slight variation in their species richness, diversity and evenness. Relatively community types 1, 2 and 5 were the richest with respect to species richness and diversity while community types 3 and 4 the lowest. The differences in species richness among the five communities could mainly be attributed to the dissimilarities of the communities in terms of location, altitude, human impact, rainfall, and other biotic and abiotic factors. According Eilu and Obua to [65], different altitudes and slopes influence species richness and dispersion behaviour of tree species. Altitude and climatic variables like temperature and rainfall are also other determinant factors that affect species richness [66].

Plant community—environmental variables relationship

In the current study, the multivariate analyses (both Ordination and cluster analysis) were consistent in showing the patterns of floristic grouping within the studied forest and hence the two methods are complementary. The variable with the highest score (0.88) associated with axis one was the altitude. Therefore, altitude was the most important variable in weighting axis one and to interpret or explain the axis. Similar studies conducted in other Afromontane forests of Ethiopia also confirm the importance of altitude as a major determinant of vegetation distribution along altitudinal gradients [57, 67, 68]. Altitudinal change leads to changes in humidity, temperature, soil type, and other factors that influence the growth and development of plants which in turn determine the patterns of vegetation distribution [69, 70].

Potassium followed by altitude was also the most important constraining variable in weighing axis one in the ordination. In the sandy soil, plant-soil feedback effects were most strongly correlated with potassium. Although most studies investigating abiotic plant-soil interactions have focused on nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics, in sandy soils with little clay content, potassium could be a limiting factor for plant growth [71, 72]. In particular, a growth of forbs can be highly dependent on potassium [71] and hence potassium at least affects the distribution of these species. In the same way, the disturbance was the most important variable in weighting axis two. Disturbance affects the distribution of plant communities by hampering natural regeneration and seedling establishment in tropical forests [73]. Disturbance also favours the growth of herbaceous plant species by improving the availability of light conditions in the ground layer as it widens the canopy gap [74] and thus affects the distribution of communities with these species. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) performed to see any significant variation among the community types of Gerba Dima forest with respect to non-collinear significant environmental variables indicated that the five community types differ significantly from each other with regard to EC and K. Similarly, result of Tukey’s pair-wise comparison test indicates that community 4 and 1 differ significantly with respect to Disturbance and K while community 2 and 3 showed significant difference with respect to EC.

Conclusions

Description of the floristic diversity of species in the Gerba Dima forest revealed the presence of high species diversity and richness. Of the species recorded in this forest, 15 (8.3%) species were endemic to Ethiopia. However, the percentage of endemic species in the study forest is lower than the proportions generally expected in the Afromontane forest of Ethiopia and this is attributed to the low endemicity feature of forests in South-western Ethiopia. In this study, five community types were identified and altitude was the major environmental variable in determining the community types. The existence of high species diversity and a number of endemic plant species in the study forest shows the potential of the area for biodiversity conservation. Thus, all Stakeholders including Oromia Forest and wildlife enterprise (OFWE) and the regional government should work to designate the forest as a biosphere reserve and being registered under UNESCO.

Availability of data and materials

We have also included part of the data used in this research and attached as Additional files 1.

Abbreviations

DCA:

Detrended Correspondence Analysis

RDA:

Redundancy Analysis

Vif:

Variance inflation factor

MRPP:

Multi-response Permutation Procedures

References

  1. Kent M. Vegetation description and data analysis: a practical approach. Chichester: Wiley; 2012. p. 414.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Legendre P. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology. 1993;74:1659–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Seabloom EW, Bjornstad ON, Bolker BM, Reichman OJ. Spatial signature of environmental heterogeneity, dispersal, and competition in successional grasslands. Ecol Monogr. 2005;75:199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dale MRT. Spatial pattern analysis in plant ecology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. MacArthur R, Levins R. The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am Nat. 1967;101:377–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Götzenberger L, de Bello F, Bräthen KA, Davison J, Dubuis A, Guisan A, Lepŝ J, Lindborg R, Moora M, Zobel M. Ecological assembly rules in plant communities—approaches, patterns and prospects. Biol Rev. 2012;87:111–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. MacArthur R. Geographical ecology: patterns in the distribution of species. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Keddy P, Weiher E. Introduction: the scope and goals of research on assembly rules. In: Weiher E, Keddy P, editors. Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tilman D, Downing JA. Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature. 1994;367:363–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grace JB. Examining the relationship between environmental variables and ordination axes using latent variables and structural equation modeling. In: Pugesek BH, Tomer A, von Eye A, editors. Structural equation modeling: applications in ecological and evolutionary biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. p. 171–93.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Kashian DM, Barnes BV, Walker WS. Ecological species groups of landform-level ecosystems dominated by jack pine in northern Lower Michigan, USA. Plant Ecol. 2003;166:75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Naumburg E, DeWald LE. Relationships between Pinus ponderosa forest structure, light characteristics, and understory graminoid species presence and abundance. For Ecol Manage. 1999;124:205–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Laughlin DC, Bakker JD, Fulȇ PZ. Understorey plant community structure in lower montane and subalpine forests, Grand Canyon National Park. USA J Biogeogr. 2005;32:2083–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayes GF, Holl KD. Cattle grazing impacts on annual forbs and vegetation composition of mesic grasslands in California. Conserv Biol. 2003;17:1694–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Malik ZA, Bhatt AB. Phytosociological analysis of woody species in Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary and its adjoining areas in Western Himalaya, India. J For Environ Sci. 2015;31:149–63.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mishra AK, Behera SK, Singh K, et al. Influence of abiotic factors on community structure of understory vegetation in moist deciduous forests of north India. For Sci Pract. 2013;15:261–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010‐Country Report Ethiopia. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rome, Italy. 2010.

  18. Westpha E. Agricultural system in Ethiopia. Poduc: Wageningen; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Asres T. Agroecological zones of Southwest Ethiopia. Matreialien Zurostafrica Forschung. 1996;13:1–241.

    Google Scholar 

  20. NMSA. National Meteorological Service Agency, Ethiopia. 2016.

  21. Friis I, Demissew S, van Breugel P. A new potential vegetation map of Ethiopia in 1:2,000,000. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabers Selskab. 2010.

  22. Mueller D, Ellenberg H. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. New York: Willey; 1974. p. 547.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Van der Maarel E. Transformation of cover abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community. Vegetation. 1979;39:97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Edwards S, Tadesse M, Hedberg I, editors. Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Canellaceae to Euphorbiaceae, vol 2(2). Addis Ababa: The National Herbarium, Addis Ababa University. 1995.

  25. Edwards S, Demissew S, Hedberg I, editors. Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Hydrocharitaceae to Arecaceae, vol 6. Addis Ababa: The National Herbarium, Addis Ababa University. 1997.

  26. Edwards S, Tadesse M, Demissew S, Hedberg I, editors. Flora of Ethiopiaand Eritrea. Magnoliaceae to Flacourtiaceae, vol 2(1). Addis Ababa: The National Herbarium, Addis Ababa University. 2000.

  27. Hedberg I, Edwards S, editors. Flora of Ethiopia. Pittosporaceae to Araliacae, vol 3. Addis Ababa: The National Herbarium, Addis Ababa University. 1989.

  28. Hedberg I, Edwards S, Nemomissa S, editors. Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Asteraceae, vol 4(2). Addis Ababa: The National Herbarium, Addis Ababa University. 2004.

  29. Hedberg I, Kelbessa E, Edwards S, Demissew S, Persson E, editors. Flora of Ethiopia and eritrea. Gentianaceae to Cyclocheilaceae, vol 5. Addis Ababa: The National Herbarium, Addis Ababa University. 2006.

  30. Hedberg I, Edwards S, Nemomissa S, editors. Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Apiaceae to Dipsaceae, vol 4(1). Addis Ababa: The National Herbarium, Addis Ababa University. 2003.

  31. Hedberg I, Edwards S, editors. Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Poaceae, vol 7. Addis Ababa: The National Herbarium, Addis Ababa University. 1995.

  32. Hedberg I, Friis IB, Persson E, editors. Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Lyvopodiaceae to Pinaceae, vol 1. Addis Ababa: The National Herbarium, Addis Ababa University. 2009.

  33. Woldu Z, Feoli E, Nigatu L. Partitioning an elevation gradient of vegetation from south eastern Ethiopia by probabilistic methods. Vegetation. 1989;81:189–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Anderson EW, Currier WF. Evaluating zones of Utilization. J Range Manag. 1973;26(2):87–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Allen SE. Chemical analysis of ecological materials. Oxford: Blackwell; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  36. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. 2019. http://www.R-project.org/.

  37. McCune B, Grace JB. Analysis of ecological communities. USA: MjM SoftwareDesign; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Woldu Z. Comprehensive analysis of vegetation and ecological data: basics, concepts and methods. Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University Press; 2016. p. 408.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Van der Maarel E, Espejel I, Moreno-Casasola P. Two-step vegetation analysis based on very large data sets. Vegetation. 1987;68:139–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Magurran AE. Ecological diversity and its measurement. London: Chapman and Hall; 1988.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Vivero JL, Kelbessa E, Demissew S. The Red List of Endemic Trees & Shrubs of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Fauna & Flora International, United Kingdom. 2005; p. 28.

  42. Gentry AH. Patterns of diversity and floristic composition in neotropical montane forests. In: Biodiversity and Conservation of Neotropical Montane Forests. In: Churchill SP, Balslev H, Forero E, Luteyn JL, eds. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York. 1995; pp 103–126.

  43. Coetzee JA. Phytogeographical aspects of the montane forests of the chain ofmountains on the eastern side of Africa. Erdwissenschaft Forschung. 1978;11:482–94.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bekele T. Vegetation ecology of remnant Afromontane forests on the centralplateau of Shewa, Ethiopia. Acta Phytogeographica, Sukecica. 1993;79:1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lovett JC. Eastern Tropical African Center of Endemism: a candidate for worldheritage status? J East Afr Nat Hist. 1998;87:359–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kelbessa E, Demissew S. Diversity of vascular plant taxa of the flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Ethiop J Biol Sci. 2014;13(1):37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kelbessa E, Soromessa T. Interfaces of regeneration, structure, diversity anduse of some plant species in Bonga forest: aA reservoir for wild coffee gene pool. SINET Ethiop J Sci. 2008;31(2):121–34.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Assefa A, Demissew S, Woldu Z. Floristic composition, structure andregeneration status of Masha forest, south-west Ethiopia. Afr J Ecol. 2013;52:151–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Addi A, Soromessa T, Kelebessa K, Dibaba A, Kefyalew A. Floristiccomposition and plant community types of Agama Forest, an “Afromontane Forest” inSouthwest Ethiopia. J Ecol Nat Environ. 2016;8(5):55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hedberg O. Features of Afroalpine plant ecology. Acta PhytogeographySuec. 1964;49:1–144.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hedberg I, Friis I, Persson E, editors. Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea Volume 8, General part and Index to Volumes 1–7. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Uppsala, Sweden. 2009.

  52. Gebre Hiwot K, Hundera K. Species composition, Plant Community structure and Natural regeneration status of Belete Moist Evergreen Montane Forest, Oromia Regional state, Southwestern Ethiopia. Momona Ethiop J Sci (MEJS). 2014;1:97–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Alemu B, Kitessa Hundera K, Abera B. Floristic composition and structural analysis of Gelesha forest, Gambella regional State. Southwest Ethiop J Ecol Nat Environ. 2015;7(7):218–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Gurmessa F, Soromessa T, Kelbessa E. Floristic composition and community analysis of Komto Afromontane moist forest, East Wollega Zone, West Ethiopia. Sci Technol Arts Res J. 2013;2(2):58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Burju T, Hundera K, Kelbessa E. Floristic composition and structural analysis of Jibat Humid Afromontane Forest, West Shewa Zone, Oromia National Regional State, Ethiopia. Ethiop J Educ & Sc. 2013;8(2):11–33.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Woldemariam T, Borsch T, Denich M, Teketay D. Floristic composition and environmental factors characterizing coffee forests in southwest Ethiopia. For Ecol Manage. 2008;255:2138–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Lulekal E, Kelbessa E, Bekele T, Yineger H. Plant species composition and structure of the Mana Angetu Moist Montane Forest, South-Eastern Ethiopia. J East Afr Nat Hist. 2008;97:165–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Bekele G, Reddy PR. Study of vegetation composition of Magada Forest, Borana Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia. Universal J Plant Sci. 2015;3(5):87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Addi A, Soromessa T, Bekele T. Plant diversity and community analysis of Gesha and Sayilem Forest in Kaffa Zone, southwestern Ethiopia. Biodiversitas. 2020;21:2878–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Shmida A, Wilson MV. Biological determinants of species diversity. J Biogeogr. 1985;12:1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Brockway DG. Forest plant diversity at local and landscape scales in the Cascade Mountains of southwestern Washington. For Ecol Manage. 1998;109:323–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Pausas JG, Austin MP. Patterns of plant species richness in relation to different environments: an appraisal. J Veg Sci. 2001;12:153–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Tuomisto H, Roukolainen K, Yli-Halla M. Dispersal, environment, and floristic variation of Western Amazonian Forests. Science. 2003;299:241–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Chen J, Song B, Rudnicki M, Moeur M, Bible K, North M, Shaw DC, Franklin JF, Braun DM. Spatial relationship of biomass and species distribution in an old-growth Pseudotsuga - Tsuga Forest. For Sci. 2003;50:364–75.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Eilu G, Obua J. Tree condition and natural regeneration in disturbed sites of Bwindi Impenetrable forest national park, Southwestern Uganda. Trop Ecol. 2005;46:99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Kharkwal G, Mehrotra P, Rawat YS, Pangtey YPS. Phytodiversityand growth form in relation to altitudinal gradient in the Central Himalayan (Kumaun)region of India. Curr Sci. 2005;89:873–8.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Yeshitela K, Bekele T. Plant community analysis and ecology of Afromontane and transitional rainforest vegetation of south-western Ethiopia. SINET Ethiop J Sci. 2002;25(2):155–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Yineger H, Kelbessa E, Bekele T, Lulekal E. Floristic composition and structure of the dry Afromontane Forest at Bale Mountains National Park. SINET Ethiop J Sci. 2008;31(2):103–20.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Austin M, Pausas J, Nicholls A. Patterns of tree species richness in relationto environment in South-eastern New South Wales, Australia. Austra J Ecol. 1996;21:164–5.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Vittoz P, Bayfield N, Brooker R, Elston DA, Duff EI, Theurillat JP, Guisan A. Reproducibility of species lists, visual cover estimates and frequency methods for recording high-mountain vegetation. J Veg Sci. 2010;21:1035–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Tilman EA, Tilman D, Crawley MJ, Johnston AE. Biological weed control via nutrient competition: potassium limitation of dandelions. Ecol Appl. 1999;9:103–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Kayser M, Isselstein J. Potassium cycling and losses in grassland systems: a review. Grass Forage Sci. 2005;60:213–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Bussmann RW. Succession and regeneration patterns of East African mountain forests. Syst Geogr Plants. 2001;71:957–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Engelbrecht BMJ, Comita LS, Condit R, Kursar TA, Tyree MT, Turner BL, Hubbell SP. Drought sensitivity shapes species distribution patterns in tropical forests. Nature. 2007;447(3):80–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Addis Ababa University for providing logistics for fieldwork and laboratory analysis.

Funding

This study was supported by International Foundation for Science (Grant Number D/5481-1). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Natural Sciences, Department of Biology, Debre Berhan University, P. O. Box 445, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia

    Abyot Dibaba

  2. Center for Environmental Science, Addis Ababa University, P. O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Teshome Soromessa

  3. College of Natural Sciences, Department of Plant Biology and Biodiversity Management, Addis Ababa University, P. O. Box 3434, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Bikila Warkineh

Authors
  1. Abyot Dibaba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Teshome Soromessa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bikila Warkineh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors have made substantive intellectual contributions to this manuscript. AD is made substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data and also been involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content. TS is also made substantial contributions to conception and design of data, or analysis and interpretation of data but not involved in data collection or acquisition of data. BW has been involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abyot Dibaba.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research is mainly an ecological and study and did not involve experiment on plant species. Thus, Parts related to Ethics approval and consent to participate is not applicable for this work. Related to this part, the collected plant specimens in this research were deposited in the national herbarium of Ethiopia. However, experiment was not conducted on the plant. Permissions were needed and subsequently obtained From Oromia Forest and Wildlife Enterprise in order to use/sample the land as described, and obtain samples.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Dominant families with their respective species number of Gerba Dima Forest.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dibaba, A., Soromessa, T. & Warkineh, B. Plant community analysis along environmental gradients in moist afromontane forest of Gerba Dima, South-western Ethiopia. BMC Ecol Evo 22, 12 (2022). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12862-022-01964-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12862-022-01964-4

Keywords

BMC Ecology and Evolution

ISSN: 2730-7182

Contact us