Andersson M. Sexual selection. Prinston: Princeton University Press; 1994.
Møller A, Jennions M. How important are direct fitness benefits of sexual selection? Naturwissenschaften. 2001;88:401–15.
Frischknecht M. The breeding colouration of male three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) as an indicator of energy investment in vigour. Evol Ecol. 1993;7:439–50.
Ohlsson T, Smith HG, Råberg L, Hasselquist D. Pheasant sexual ornaments reflect nutritional conditions during early growth. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci. 2002;269:21–7.
Uetz GW, Papke R, Kilinc B. Influence of feeding regime on body size, body condition and a male secondary sexual character in Schizocosa ocreata wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae): condition-dependence in a visual signaling trait. J Arachnol. 2002;30:461–9.
Velando A, Beamonte-Barrientos R, Torres R. Pigment-based skin colour in the blue-footed booby: an honest signal of current condition used by females to adjust reproductive investment. Oecologia. 2006;149:535–42.
Møller AP, Christe P, Lux E. Parasitism, host immune function, and sexual selection. Q Rev Biol. 1999;74(1):3–20.
Mougeot F, Irvine JR, Seivwright L, et al. Testosterone, immunocompetence, and honest sexual signaling in male red grouse. Behav Ecol. 2004;15:930–7.
Peters A, Delhey K, Denk AG, Kempenaers B. Trade-offs between immune investment and sexual signaling in male mallards. Am Nat. 2004;164:51–9.
Clotfelter ED, Ardia DR, McGraw KJ. Red fish, blue fish: trade-offs between pigmentation and immunity in Betta splendens. Behav Ecol. 2007;18:1139–45.
McGraw KJ, Hill GE. Differential effects of endoparasitism on the expression of carotenoid- and melanin-based ornamental coloration. P R Soc B-Biol Sci. 2000;267:1525–31.
Hill GE. Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature. 1991;350:337–9.
Candolin U. Changes in expression and honesty of sexual signalling over the reproductive lifetime of sticklebacks. P R Soc B-Biol Sci. 2000;267:2425–30.
Mitchell DP, Dunn PO, Whittingham LA, Freeman-Gallant CR. Attractive males provide less parental care in two populations of the common yellowthroat. Anim Behav. 2007;73:165–70.
Neff BD, Pitcher TE. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Mol Ecol. 2005;14:19–38.
Bonduriansky R, Maklakov A, Zajitschek F, Brooks R. Sexual selection, sexual conflict and the evolution of ageing and life span. Funct Ecol. 2008;22:443–53.
Long TAF, Agrawal AF, Rowe L. The effect of sexual selection on offspring fitness depends on the nature of genetic variation. Curr Biol. 2012;22:204–8.
Parker TH, Ligon JD. Dominant male red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) test the dominance status of other males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2002;53:20–4.
Promislow DEL. Costs of sexual selection in natural populations of mammals. P R Soc B. 1992;247:203–10.
Vieira C, Pasyukova EG, Zeng ZB, et al. Genotype-environment interaction for quantitative trait loci affecting life span in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2000;154:213–27.
Hunt J, Brooks R, Jennions MD, et al. High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young. Nature. 2004;432:1024–7.
Kotiaho JS. Costs of sexual traits: a mismatch between theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Biol Rev Camb Philos. 2001;76:365–76.
Radwan J, Chadzińska M, Cichoń M, et al. Metabolic costs of sexual advertisement in the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus). Evol Ecol Res. 2006;8:859–69.
Kelly RJ, Murphy TG, Tarvin KA, Burness G. Carotenoid-based ornaments of female and male American goldfinches (Spinus tristis) show sex-specific correlations with immune function and metabolic rate. Physiol Biochem Zool. 2012;85:348–63.
Hartmann N, Reichwald K, Wittig I, Dröse S, Schmeisser S, Lück C, et al. Mitochondrial DNA copy number and function decrease with age in the short-lived fish Nothobranchius furzeri. Aging Cell. 2011;10:824–31.
Zhu S, Coffman JA. Simple and fast quantification of DNA damage by real-time PCR, and its application to nuclear and mitochondrial DNA from multiple tissues of aging zebrafish. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10:1–6.
Fan X, Wang L, Wei X, Zhang J, Su X, Cui L, et al. The impairment of continuous malnutrition on larval fish swimming performance at the mouth-opening stage. Aquaculture. 2021;544:737053.
Adelman R, Saul RL, Ames BN. Oxidative damage to DNA: relation to species metabolic rate and life span. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988;85:2706–8.
Preston BT, Jalme MS, Hingrat Y, et al. Sexually extravagant males age more rapidly. Ecol Lett. 2011;14:1017–24.
Tomášek O, Albrechtová J, Němcová M, et al. Trade-off between carotenoid-based sexual ornamentation and sperm resistance to oxidative challenge. P R Soc B-Biol Sci. 2017;284:20162444.
Kim SY, Velando A. Attractive male sticklebacks carry more oxidative DNA damage in the soma and germline. J Evol Biol. 2020;33(1):121–6.
Luo J, Mills K, le Cessie S, et al. Ageing, age-related diseases and oxidative stress: what to do next? Ageing Res Rev. 2020;57:100982.
Rajesh Kumar T, Doreswamy K, Shrilatha B, Muralidhara. Oxidative stress associated DNA damage in testis of mice: induction of abnormal sperms and effects on fertility. Mutat Res. 2002;513:103–11.
Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN. Origins and consequences of DNA damage in male germ cells. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:727–33.
Lane M, McPherson NO, Fullston T, et al. Oxidative stress in mouse sperm impairs embryo development, fetal growth and alters adiposity and glucose regulation in female offspring. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:1–9.
Kim SY, Velando A. Genetic conflict between sexual signalling and juvenile survival in the three-spined stickleback. BMC Evol Biol. 2016;16:1–7.
Reinhold K, Greenfield MD, Jang Y, Broce A. Energetic cost of sexual attractiveness: ultrasonic advertisement in wax moths. Anim Behav. 1998;55:905–13.
Eberhardt LS. Oxygen consumption during singing by male Carolina Wrens (Thryothorus ludovicianus). Auk. 1994;111:124–30.
Clark CJ. The role of power versus energy in courtship: what is the “energetic cost” of a courtship display? Anim Behav. 2012;84:269–77.
Lailvaux SP, Irschick DJ. A functional perspective on sexual selection: insights and future prospects. Anim Behav. 2006;72:263–73.
Ward AJW, Hart PJB, Krause J. The effects of habitat- and diet-based cues on association preferences in three-spined sticklebacks. Behav Ecol. 2004;15(6):925–9.
Watson PJ, Lighton JRB. Sexual selection and the energetics of copulatory courtship in the Sierra dome spider, Linyphia litigiosa. Anim Behav. 1994;48:615–26.
Barske J, Schlinger BA, Wikelski M, Fusani L. Female choice for male motor skills. P R Soc B-Biol Sci. 2011;278:3523–8.
Riechert SE. The consequences of being territorial: spiders, a case study. Am Nat. 1981;117:871–92.
Barlow GW. Mate choice in the monogamous and polychromatic Midas cichlid, Cichlasoma citrinellum. J Fish Biol. 1986;29:123–33.
Jaroensutasinee M, Jaroensutasinee K. Type of intruder and reproductive phase influence male territorial defence in wild-caught Siamese fighting fish. Behav Proc. 2003;64(1):23–9.
Ward G, FitzGerald GJ. Male aggression and female mate choice in the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. J Fish Biol. 1987;30:679–90.
Dey CJ, O’Connor CM, Gilmour KM, Van Der Kraak G, Cooke SJ. Behavioral and physiological responses of a wild teleost fish to cortisol and androgen manipulation during parental care. Horm Behav. 2010;58(4):599–605.
Candolin U. The relationship between signal quality and physical condition: is sexual signalling honest in the three-spined stickleback? Anim Behav. 1999;58:1261–7.
Milinski M, Bakker TCM. Female sticklebacks use male colouration as a basis for mate choice and hence avoid parasitised males. Nature. 1990;344:330–3.
Johnson S, Candolin U. Predation cost of a sexual signal in the threespine stickleback. Behav Ecol. 2017;28:1160–5.
Pike TW, Blount JD, Bjerkeng B, et al. Carotenoids, oxidative stress and female mating preference for longer lived males. P R Soc B-Biol Sci. 2007;274:1591–6.
Kim SY, Costa MM, Esteve-Codina A, Velando A. Transcriptional mechanisms underlying life-history responses to climate change in the three-spined stickleback. Evol Appl. 2017;10:718–30.
Andersson M, Simmons LW. Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006;21:296–302.
Kim SY, Noguera JC, Velando A. Carry-over effects of early thermal conditions on somatic and germline oxidative damages are mediated by compensatory growth in sticklebacks. J Anim Ecol. 2019;88:473–83.
Pike TW, Blount JD, Lindström J, Metcalfe NB. Dietary carotenoid availability, sexual signalling and functional fertility in sticklebacks. Biol Lett. 2010;6:191–3.
Álvarez-Quintero N, Velando A, Noguera JC, Kim SY. Environment-induced changes in reproductive strategies and their transgenerational effects in the three-spined stickleback. Ecol Evol. 2021;11:771–83.
Kim SY, Velando A. Stickleback males increase red coloration and courtship behaviours in the presence of a competitive rival. Ethology. 2014;120:502–10.
Bakker TCM, Sevenster P. Determinants of dominance in male sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Behaviour. 1983;86:55–71.
Pike TW, Blount JD, Lindström J, Metcalfe NB. Availability of non-carotenoid antioxidants affects the expression of a carotenoid-based sexual ornament. Biol Lett. 2007;3:353–6.
Hiermes M, Rick IP, Mehlis M, Bakker TCM. The dynamics of color signals in male threespine sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus. Curr Zool. 2016;62:23–31.
Kraak SBM, Bakker TCM. Mutual mate choice in sticklebacks: attractive males choose big females, which lay big eggs. Anim Behav. 1998;56:859–66.
Reynolds JD, Gross MR. Female mate preference enhances offspring growth and reproduction in a fish, Poecilia reticulata. P R Soc B-Biol Sci. 1992;250:57–62.
Norris K. Heritable variation in a plumage indicator of viability in male great tits Parus major. Nature. 1993;362:537–9.
Møller AP. Male ornament size as a reliable cue to enhanced offspring viability in the barn swallow. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:6929–32.
Petrie M. Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains. Nature. 1994;371:598–9.
Barber I, Arnott SA, Braithwaite VA, et al. Indirect fitness consequences of mate choice in sticklebacks: offspring of brighter males grow slowly but resist parasitic infections. P R Soc B-Biol Sci. 2001;268:71–6.
Kekäläinen J, Huuskonen H, Tuomaala M, Kortet R. Both male and female sexual ornaments reflect offspring performance in a fish. Evolution. 2010;64:3149–57.
Simmons LW, Holley R. Offspring viability benefits but no apparent costs of mating with high quality males. Biol Lett. 2011;7:419–21.
Weir LK, Grant JWA. Courtship rate signals fertility in an externally fertilizing fish. Biol Lett. 2010;6:727–31.
Hoelzer GA. The good parent model of sexual selection. Anim Behav. 1989;38:1067–78.
Kim SY, Metcalfe NB, Velando A. A benign juvenile environment reduces the strength of antagonistic pleiotropy and genetic variation in the rate of senescence. J Anim Ecol. 2016;85:705–14.
Álvarez-Quintero N, Velando A, Kim SY. Smart mating: the cognitive ability of females influences their preference for male cognitive ability. Behav Ecol. 2021. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/beheco/arab052.
Polak M, Starmer WT. Parasite-induced risk of mortality elevates reproductive effort in male Drosophila. P R Soc B-Biol Sci. 1998;265:2197–201.
Barber I, Arnott SA. Split-clutch IVF: a technique to examine indirect fitness consequences of mate preferences in sticklebacks. Behaviour. 2000;137:1129–40.
Friard O, Gamba M. BORIS: a free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations. Methods Ecol Evol. 2016;7:1325–30.
Auer SK, Dick CA, Metcalfe NB, Reznick DN. Metabolic rate evolves rapidly and in parallel with the pace of life history. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1–6.
Mangiafico SS. Summary and analysis of extension program evaluation in R, version 1.18.8. 2016.
Stoffel MA, Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H. rptR: repeatability estimation and variance decomposition by generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol. 2017;8:1639–44.