Skip to main content

Table 1 Genetic diversity indices (values are given as mean ± SE) of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) populations in Ethiopia

From: Genetic diversity of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) populations in Ethiopia: insights from nuclear DNA microsatellites and implications for conservation

Drainage

Population code

N

Na

Ne

Np

I

Ho

He

uHe

F

%dHWE

%NA

%poly

Blue Nile

TA

15.19

3.78 ± 0.38

1.97 ± 0.25

1.11 ± 0.34

0.67 ± 0.09

0.23 ± 0.05

0.32 ± 0.04

0.33 ± 0.05

0.47 ± 0.07

64.86

56.76

97.3

FI

12.87

2.23 ± 0.23

1.71 ± 0.15

0.00 ± 0.00

0.49 ± 0.08

0.31 ± 0.06

0.29 ± 0.05

0.30 ± 0.05

− 0.04 ± 0.06

10.81

10.81

56.76

Omo-Turkana

GG

29.03

3.49 ± 0.32

2.10 ± 0.16

0.51 ± 0.17

0.75 ± 0.08

0.35 ± 0.04

0.42 ± 0.04

0.42 ± 0.04

0.15 ± 0.05

24.32

21.62

94.59

TU

34.35

10.57 ± 1.05

4.77 ± 0.61

6.05 ± 0.82

1.56 ± 0.13

0.58 ± 0.04

0.64 ± 0.04

0.65 ± 0.04

0.08 ± 0.03

27.03

13.51

100

SMER

AB

19.7

5.08 ± 0.60

2.87 ± 0.38

0.76 ± 0.15

0.98 ± 0.12

0.48 ± 0.05

0.47 ± 0.05

0.48 ± 0.05

− 0.02 ± 0.03

10.81

5.41

91.89

CH

20.97

4.51 ± 0.54

2.60 ± 0.33

0.51 ± 0.13

0.90 ± 0.11

0.38 ± 0.05

0.44 ± 0.05

0.45 ± 0.05

0.12 ± 0.05

24.32

18.92

83.78

CMER

HW

14.87

2.76 ± 0.31

1.78 ± 0.16

0.16 ± 0.06

0.54 ± 0.09

0.31 ± 0.05

0.30 ± 0.05

0.31 ± 0.05

− 0.01 ± 0.06

13.51

10.81

70.27

LA

9.84

2.51 ± 0.29

1.75 ± 0.16

0.05 ± 0.04

0.53 ± 0.08

0.32 ± 0.06

0.30 ± 0.05

0.31 ± 0.05

− 0.06 ± 0.07

18.92

8.11

70.27

ZI

35.35

4.32 ± 0.50

2.04 ± 0.27

0.81 ± 0.17

0.67 ± 0.10

0.36 ± 0.05

0.34 ± 0.05

0.34 ± 0.05

− 0.03 ± 0.04

21.62

2.70

89.19

NMER

KO

24.19

2.30 ± 0.22

1.65 ± 0.12

0.03 ± 0.3

0.49 ± 0.08

0.31 ± 0.05

0.28 ± 0.04

0.29 ± 0.05

− 0.07 ± 0.04

10.81

2.70

62.16

MT

9.95

2.38 ± 0.27

1.86 ± 0.19

0.00 ± 0.00

0.54 ± 0.09

0.34 ± 0.06

0.31 ± 0.05

0.33 ± 0.05

− 0.08 ± 0.06

5.41

5.41

64.86

YA

8.6

2.32 ± 0.28

1.68 ± 0.19

0.11 ± 0.05

0.46 ± 0.09

0.30 ± 0.06

0.26 ± 0.04

0.27 ± 0.05

− 0.12 ± 0.07

8.11

8.11

62.16

KA

9.92

3.68 ± 0.37

2.20 ± 0.26

0.16 ± 0.07

0.80 ± 0.09

0.34 ± 0.06

0.41 ± 0.04

0.43 ± 0.04

0.36 ± 0.08

75.68

45.95

97.3

Endorheic crater lakes

HR

33.35

2.24 ± 0.25

1.69 ± 0.13

0.00 ± 0.00

0.491 ± 0.08

0.29 ± 0.05

0.29 ± 0.05

0.30 ± 0.05

0.03 ± 0.06

16.22

10.81

64.86

HS

30.97

2.95 ± 0.23

1.59 ± 0.13

0.14 ± 0.06

0.48 ± 0.08

0.28 ± 0.05

0.26 ± 0.04

0.26 ± 0.04

− 0.07 ± 0.05

18.92

5.41

81.08

HQ

23.24

1.62 ± 0.15

1.32 ± 0.09

0.00 ± 0.00

0.26 ± 0.06

0.19 ± 0.05

0.16 ± 0.04

0.17 ± 0.04

− 0.15 ± 0.06

5.41

0.00

40.54

  1. Average number of individuals per locus (N), average number of alleles per locus (Na), number of effective alleles (Ne), average number of private alleles (Np), Shannon’s information index (I), observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity (gene diversity) (He), unbiased heterozygosity (uHe), inbreeding coefficient (F), percentage of loci deviating from HWE (%dHWE), percentage of loci shown a proportion of null alleles above 0.1 (%NA),percentage of polymorphic loci (%poly). Abbreviation of population code is given in Table 3