Skip to main content

Table 2 The classification of the non-Ethiopian L. flavopunctatus members based on discriminant analysis of linear and geometric craniodental characters

From: Historical biogeography, systematics, and integrative taxonomy of the non-Ethiopian speckled pelage brush-furred rats (Lophuromys flavopunctatus group)

(a)

     
 

1

2

3

N

σ

Linear

     

 1 L. aquilus

92.3

0

7.7

13

95.2

 2 L. kilonzoi

2.7

94.6

2.7

74

 3 L. verhageni

0.0

0.0

100

17

Geometric

     

 1 L. aquilus

84.6

0

15.4

13

87.4

 2 L. kilonzoi

0

88.1

11.9

67

 3 L. verhageni

13.3

0

86.7

15

(b)

          
 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

N

σ

Linear

          

 1 L. cf. cinereus

57.4

4.9

16.4

4.9

4.9

1.6

8.2

1.6

61

44.6

 2 L. dudui

13.8

55.2

20.7

0

0

0

6.9

3.4

29

 3 L. laticeps

23.1

3.8

38.5

7.7

0

3.8

19.2

3.8

26

 4 L. machangui

5.9

4.7

4.7

60.0

0

10.6

5.9

8.2

85

 5 L. makundii

3.3

0

0

0.0

83.3

0

6.7

6.7

30

 6 L. sabuni

0

0

0

13.6

0

81.8

0

4.5

22

 7 L. stanleyi

13.7

10.9

12.8

6.6

7.6

1.9

35.5

10.9

211

 8 L. zena

3.2

10.2

7.6

13.4

20.4

5.7

9.6

29.9

157

Geometric

          

 1 L. cf. cinereus

47.4

8.8

10.5

5.3

5.3

0

19.3

3.5

57

59.4

 2 L. dudui

24.1

51.7

6.9

0

0

3.4

13.8

0

29

 3 L. laticeps

14.3

9.5

42.9

0

0

4.8

19

9.5

21

 4 L. machangui

2.5

1.3

0

79.7

1.3

8.9

3.8

2.5

79

 5 L. makundii

0

3.6

0

0

85.7

0

0

10.7

28

 6 L. sabuni

0

5.3

0

15.8

0

63.2

5.3

10.5

19

 7 L. stanleyi

13.1

6

9

2.5

3

1.5

53.8

11.1

199

 8 L. zena

3.7

3.7

3.7

6.5

7.5

5.6

10.3

58.9

107

  1. The results are partitioned by the two subclades; NONETHFLAVO1 in a and NONETHFLAVO2 in b. Values represent the cross-validated (leave-one-out bootstrapping) percentage success by which samples were predicted into the corresponding species group. The diagonal values in bold fonts indicate the percentage success by which samples were predicted into their groups which correspond to the Cytochrome b clades in Fig. 1. The classification of the combined clades is shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S7
  2. σ = overall classification success, N = number of samples